Treatment of acute midshaft clavicle fractures: Systematic review of 2144 fractures. On behalf of the Evidence-Based Orthopaedic Trauma Working Group

Michael Zlowodzki, Boris A. Zelle, Peter A. Cole, Kyle Jeray, Michael D. McKee

Producción científica: Review articlerevisión exhaustiva

496 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

Background: Fractures of the clavicle were reported to represent 2.6% of all fractures with an overall incidence of 64 per 100,000 per year (1987, Malmö, Sweden). Midshaft fractures account for approximately 69% to 81% of all clavicle fractures. Treatment options for acute midshaft clavicle fractures include nonoperative treatment (mostly sling or figure-of-eight bandage), open reduction and internal fixation with plates, and closed or open reduction and internal fixation with intramedullary pins, wires, or a nail. Most surgeons prefer nonoperative treatment of nondisplaced midshaft clavicle fractures. However, the optimal treatment option for isolated acute displaced midshaft clavicle fractures remains controversial. Objectives: This study was designed to systematically summarize and compare results of different treatment options (nonoperative, operative extramedullary fixation, and operative intramedullary fixation) in the management of midshaft clavicle fractures, specifically for displaced fractures.

Idioma originalEnglish (US)
Páginas (desde-hasta)504-507
Número de páginas4
PublicaciónJournal of orthopaedic trauma
Volumen19
N.º7
DOI
EstadoPublished - ago 2005
Publicado de forma externa

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Treatment of acute midshaft clavicle fractures: Systematic review of 2144 fractures. On behalf of the Evidence-Based Orthopaedic Trauma Working Group'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto