Resumen
Physicians increasingly need information about their communities to use in care of the individual patient. Busy practitioners need feasible methods for collecting this information before they can begin to gather and use it, however. Our objective was to study key informant trees as a practical approach for practice-based gathering of qualitative data from a community. Following a standard protocol, key informant trees were set up in 11 different practices to study the costs, advantages, and problems with their use for this purpose. Time studies showed that each tree took 7 to 11 hours of physician time and 7 hours of clerical time to organize and conduct. The technique appeared to be best suited for two qualitative informational needs: idea generation and explanatory data gathering. Trees appeared most productive where there was stability of physician staff in the practice, where the practice had been present in the community for some years, and where community residents were relatively stable. Response and selection biases are important considerations in use of this technique. Key informant trees are a feasible tool for conducting qualitative community assessment. As part of community-oriented primary care, they may prove useful for testing this paradigm of future primary care.
Idioma original | English (US) |
---|---|
Páginas (desde-hasta) | 157-162 |
Número de páginas | 6 |
Publicación | Journal of the National Medical Association |
Volumen | 92 |
N.º | 4 |
Estado | Published - abr 2000 |
Publicado de forma externa | Sí |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Medicine