TY - JOUR
T1 - The future of maxillofacial prosthodontics in North America
T2 - Part I—Journey to the present
AU - Wolfaardt, Johan F.
AU - Brecht, Lawrence E.
AU - Taft, Robert M.
N1 - Funding Information:
L.E.B. and R.M.T. are past Presidents of the American Academy of Maxillofacial Prosthetics. J.F.W. is a past member of the Board of Directors of the Academy. This article is derived from a report on the future of maxillofacial prosthodontics in North America provided to the President, American Academy of Maxillofacial Prosthetics (AAMP). The full report may be requested from the corresponding author. Role of the funding source: This article did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. In the course of the present work, L.E.B. assumed the position of President of The Maxillofacial Foundation. The coauthors of the present work did not consider that this in any way influenced the contribution to the present work by L.E.B.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Editorial Council for the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
PY - 2022/2
Y1 - 2022/2
N2 - Statement of problem: Understanding how maxillofacial prosthodontists are perceiving changes in head and neck care and the impact of advanced digital technologies on maxillofacial prosthodontics is important. However, no studies could be identified that specifically addressed these subjects. Purpose: The purpose of this review of selected literature was to identify issues that guided the development of maxillofacial prosthodontics and the concerns that persist. The review also considered contemporary influences that will affect the future of maxillofacial prosthodontics. The conclusions of the review were used to interpret the results of the exploratory survey reported in Part II. Material and methods: The review of selected literature was related to the development of maxillofacial prosthodontics in North America between 1950 and 2018. Literature that was considered relevant to the purpose of the review was included. Results: The review yielded 37 references of interest: 34 peer-reviewed publications, 1 guideline, 1 historical publication, and 1 website. Periods in the development of maxillofacial prosthodontics in North America were identified as formation, consolidation, and innovation. Conclusions: It was concluded that concerns in subspecialty programs and clinical practice had origins in the formation and consolidation periods. These persisting concerns extended into the innovation period. Contemporary influences in head and neck surgery will continue to affect the future of maxillofacial prosthodontics. Advanced digital technologies appeared to be central to driving change. Understanding the evolution of maxillofacial prosthodontics was an important first step in providing context when interpreting the results of a survey of maxillofacial prosthodontists reported as Part II of this work.
AB - Statement of problem: Understanding how maxillofacial prosthodontists are perceiving changes in head and neck care and the impact of advanced digital technologies on maxillofacial prosthodontics is important. However, no studies could be identified that specifically addressed these subjects. Purpose: The purpose of this review of selected literature was to identify issues that guided the development of maxillofacial prosthodontics and the concerns that persist. The review also considered contemporary influences that will affect the future of maxillofacial prosthodontics. The conclusions of the review were used to interpret the results of the exploratory survey reported in Part II. Material and methods: The review of selected literature was related to the development of maxillofacial prosthodontics in North America between 1950 and 2018. Literature that was considered relevant to the purpose of the review was included. Results: The review yielded 37 references of interest: 34 peer-reviewed publications, 1 guideline, 1 historical publication, and 1 website. Periods in the development of maxillofacial prosthodontics in North America were identified as formation, consolidation, and innovation. Conclusions: It was concluded that concerns in subspecialty programs and clinical practice had origins in the formation and consolidation periods. These persisting concerns extended into the innovation period. Contemporary influences in head and neck surgery will continue to affect the future of maxillofacial prosthodontics. Advanced digital technologies appeared to be central to driving change. Understanding the evolution of maxillofacial prosthodontics was an important first step in providing context when interpreting the results of a survey of maxillofacial prosthodontists reported as Part II of this work.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85099126121&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85099126121&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.11.012
DO - 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.11.012
M3 - Article
C2 - 33431175
AN - SCOPUS:85099126121
SN - 0022-3913
VL - 127
SP - 345
EP - 350
JO - Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
JF - Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
IS - 2
ER -