TY - JOUR
T1 - The economic burden of diabetes in spinal fusion surgery
T2 - a systematic review and meta-analysis
AU - Mariscal, Gonzalo
AU - Sasso, Rick C.
AU - O’Toole, John E.
AU - Chaput, Christopher D.
AU - Steinmetz, Michael P.
AU - Arnold, Paul M.
AU - Witiw, Christopher D.
AU - Jacobs, W. Bradley
AU - Harrop, James S.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2024.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Purpose: This study aimed at comparing the costs of spinal fusion surgery between patients with and without diabetes. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search of four databases was conducted. A meta-analysis was performed on comparative studies examining diabetic versus non-diabetic adults undergoing cervical/lumbar fusion in terms of cost. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 test. Standardized mean differences (SMD) and odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a random-effects model in the presence of heterogeneity. Results: Twenty-two studies were included in this meta-analysis. Standardized costs were significantly higher in the diabetic group (SMD 0.02, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.03, p < 0.05). The excess cost per diabetic patient undergoing spinal fusion surgery was estimated to be $2,492 (95% CI: $1,620 to $3,363). The length of stay (LOS) was significantly longer in the diabetes group (MD 0.42, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.60, p < 0.001). No significant difference was observed in intensive care unit admission between the groups (OR 4.15, 95% CI 0.55 to 31.40, p > 0.05). Reoperation showed no significant differences between the groups (OR 1.14, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.35, p > 0.05). However, 30-day and 90-day readmissions were significantly higher in the diabetes group: (OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.24 to 1.62, p < 0.05) and (OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.68, p < 0.001), respectively. Non-routine or non-home discharge was also significantly higher in the diabetes group (OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.67 to 2.13, p < 0.001). Conclusion: Patients with diabetes undergoing spinal fusion surgery had increased costs, prolonged LOS, increased 30-day/90-day readmission rates, and more frequent non-routine discharges.
AB - Purpose: This study aimed at comparing the costs of spinal fusion surgery between patients with and without diabetes. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic search of four databases was conducted. A meta-analysis was performed on comparative studies examining diabetic versus non-diabetic adults undergoing cervical/lumbar fusion in terms of cost. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 test. Standardized mean differences (SMD) and odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a random-effects model in the presence of heterogeneity. Results: Twenty-two studies were included in this meta-analysis. Standardized costs were significantly higher in the diabetic group (SMD 0.02, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.03, p < 0.05). The excess cost per diabetic patient undergoing spinal fusion surgery was estimated to be $2,492 (95% CI: $1,620 to $3,363). The length of stay (LOS) was significantly longer in the diabetes group (MD 0.42, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.60, p < 0.001). No significant difference was observed in intensive care unit admission between the groups (OR 4.15, 95% CI 0.55 to 31.40, p > 0.05). Reoperation showed no significant differences between the groups (OR 1.14, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.35, p > 0.05). However, 30-day and 90-day readmissions were significantly higher in the diabetes group: (OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.24 to 1.62, p < 0.05) and (OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.15 to 1.68, p < 0.001), respectively. Non-routine or non-home discharge was also significantly higher in the diabetes group (OR 1.89, 95% CI 1.67 to 2.13, p < 0.001). Conclusion: Patients with diabetes undergoing spinal fusion surgery had increased costs, prolonged LOS, increased 30-day/90-day readmission rates, and more frequent non-routine discharges.
KW - Cost analysis
KW - Diabetes
KW - Hospital costs
KW - Resource utilization
KW - Spinal fusion
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85213954002&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85213954002&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00586-024-08631-w
DO - 10.1007/s00586-024-08631-w
M3 - Review article
C2 - 39751814
AN - SCOPUS:85213954002
SN - 0940-6719
JO - European Spine Journal
JF - European Spine Journal
ER -