Resumen
To the Editor: The paper by Nienaber et al.1 and the review article by Cigarroa et al.2 (Jan. 7 issue) on diagnosing thoracic aortic dissection demonstrate the problems of evaluating rapidly developing imaging techniques. Progress in computed tomographic (CT) scanning and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is so rapid that the results of studies carried out over a five-year period1 or reported in the late 1970s and 1980s do not reflect the best current standards of clinical imaging. The CT technique used by Nienaber et al.1 was satisfactory for the older scanner (Somatom II) used in their study but not for…
| Idioma original | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Páginas (desde-hasta) | 1637-1638 |
| Número de páginas | 2 |
| Publicación | New England Journal of Medicine |
| Volumen | 328 |
| N.º | 22 |
| DOI | |
| Estado | Published - jun 3 1993 |
| Publicado de forma externa | Sí |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Medicine
Huella
Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'The Diagnosis of Thoracic Aortic Dissection by Noninvasive Imaging Procedures'. En conjunto forman una huella única.Citar esto
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS