TY - JOUR
T1 - Soft tissue volume augmentation by the use of collagen-based matrices
T2 - A volumetric analysis
AU - Thoma, Daniel S.
AU - Jung, Ronald E.
AU - Schneider, David
AU - Cochran, David L.
AU - Ender, Andreas
AU - Jones, Archie A.
AU - Görlach, Christoph
AU - Uebersax, Lorenz
AU - Graf-Hausner, Ursula
AU - Hämmerle, Christoph H.F.
PY - 2010/7
Y1 - 2010/7
N2 - Objectives: The aim was to test whether or not soft tissue augmentation with a newly developed collagen matrix (CM) leads to volume gain in chronic ridge defects similar to those obtained by an autogenous subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG). Material and Methods: In six dogs, soft tissue volume augmentation was performed by randomly allocating three treatment modalities to chronic ridge defects (CM, SCTG, sham-operated control). Impressions were taken before augmentation (baseline), at 28, and 84 days. The obtained casts were optically scanned and the images were digitally analysed. A defined region of interest was measured in all sites and the volume differences between the time points were calculated. Results: The mean volume differences per area between baseline and 28 days amounted to a gain of 1.6 mm (CM; SD±0.9), 1.5 mm (SCTG; ±0.1), and a loss of 0.003 mm (control; ±0.3). At 84 days, the mean volume differences per area to baseline measured a gain of 1.4 mm (CM; ±1.1), 1.4 mm (SCTG; ±0.4), and a loss of 0.3 mm (control; ±0.3). The differences between CM and SCTG were statistically significant compared with control at 28 and 84 days (p<0.001). Conclusion: Within the limits of this animal study, the CM may serve as a replacement for autogenous connective tissue.
AB - Objectives: The aim was to test whether or not soft tissue augmentation with a newly developed collagen matrix (CM) leads to volume gain in chronic ridge defects similar to those obtained by an autogenous subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG). Material and Methods: In six dogs, soft tissue volume augmentation was performed by randomly allocating three treatment modalities to chronic ridge defects (CM, SCTG, sham-operated control). Impressions were taken before augmentation (baseline), at 28, and 84 days. The obtained casts were optically scanned and the images were digitally analysed. A defined region of interest was measured in all sites and the volume differences between the time points were calculated. Results: The mean volume differences per area between baseline and 28 days amounted to a gain of 1.6 mm (CM; SD±0.9), 1.5 mm (SCTG; ±0.1), and a loss of 0.003 mm (control; ±0.3). At 84 days, the mean volume differences per area to baseline measured a gain of 1.4 mm (CM; ±1.1), 1.4 mm (SCTG; ±0.4), and a loss of 0.3 mm (control; ±0.3). The differences between CM and SCTG were statistically significant compared with control at 28 and 84 days (p<0.001). Conclusion: Within the limits of this animal study, the CM may serve as a replacement for autogenous connective tissue.
KW - Collagen-based matrix
KW - Soft tissue augmentation
KW - Soft tissue volume
KW - Subepithelial connective tissue graft
KW - Volumetric measurement
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77953579580&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77953579580&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01581.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01581.x
M3 - Article
C2 - 20642631
AN - SCOPUS:77953579580
SN - 0303-6979
VL - 37
SP - 659
EP - 666
JO - Journal of Clinical Periodontology
JF - Journal of Clinical Periodontology
IS - 7
ER -