TY - JOUR
T1 - Soft and hard tissue histologic dimensions around dental implants in the canine restored with smaller-diameter abutments
T2 - A paradigm shift in peri-implant biology
AU - Cochran, David L.
AU - Mau, Lian Ping
AU - Higginbottom, Frank L.
AU - Wilson, Thomas G.
AU - Bosshardt, Dieter D.
AU - Schoolfield, John
AU - Jones, Archie A.
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
N2 - Purpose: To evaluate the biologic width dimensions around implants with nonmatching implant-abutment diameters. Materials and Methods: Five canines had their mandibular premolars and first molars removed bilaterally and replaced with 12 implants that had nonmatching implant-abutment diameters. On one side, six implants were placed in a submerged surgical approach, and the other side utilized a nonsubmerged approach. Two of the implants on each side were placed either 1 mm above, even with, or 1 mm below the alveolar crest. Two months later, gold crowns were attached, and the dogs were sacrificed 6 months postloading. Block sections were processed for histologic and histomorphometric analyses. Results: The bone level, connective tissue length, epithelial dimension, and biologic width were not significantly different when the implants were initially placed in a submerged or nonsubmerged surgical approach. The bone level was significantly different around implants placed 1 mm above the crest compared to implants placed even with or 1 mm below the alveolar crest. The connective tissue dimension was not different for any implant level placement. The epithelial dimension and biologic width were significantly greater for implants placed 1 mm below the alveolar crest compared to implants placed even with or 1 mm above the alveolar crest. For five of six implant placements, connective tissue covered the implant/abutment interface. Conclusions: This study reveals a fundamental change in the biologic response to implants with nonmatching implant-abutment diameters. Unlike implants with matching implant-abutment diameters, the connective tissue extended coronally past the interface (microgap). This morphologic tissue alteration represents a significant change in the biologic reaction to implant-abutment interfaces and suggests that marginal inflammation is eliminated or greatly reduced in these implant designs.
AB - Purpose: To evaluate the biologic width dimensions around implants with nonmatching implant-abutment diameters. Materials and Methods: Five canines had their mandibular premolars and first molars removed bilaterally and replaced with 12 implants that had nonmatching implant-abutment diameters. On one side, six implants were placed in a submerged surgical approach, and the other side utilized a nonsubmerged approach. Two of the implants on each side were placed either 1 mm above, even with, or 1 mm below the alveolar crest. Two months later, gold crowns were attached, and the dogs were sacrificed 6 months postloading. Block sections were processed for histologic and histomorphometric analyses. Results: The bone level, connective tissue length, epithelial dimension, and biologic width were not significantly different when the implants were initially placed in a submerged or nonsubmerged surgical approach. The bone level was significantly different around implants placed 1 mm above the crest compared to implants placed even with or 1 mm below the alveolar crest. The connective tissue dimension was not different for any implant level placement. The epithelial dimension and biologic width were significantly greater for implants placed 1 mm below the alveolar crest compared to implants placed even with or 1 mm above the alveolar crest. For five of six implant placements, connective tissue covered the implant/abutment interface. Conclusions: This study reveals a fundamental change in the biologic response to implants with nonmatching implant-abutment diameters. Unlike implants with matching implant-abutment diameters, the connective tissue extended coronally past the interface (microgap). This morphologic tissue alteration represents a significant change in the biologic reaction to implant-abutment interfaces and suggests that marginal inflammation is eliminated or greatly reduced in these implant designs.
KW - Animal study
KW - Biologic width
KW - Dental implant-abutment interface
KW - Endosseous dental implant
KW - Platform switching
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84894385496&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84894385496&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.11607/jomi.3081
DO - 10.11607/jomi.3081
M3 - Article
C2 - 23527352
AN - SCOPUS:84894385496
SN - 0882-2786
VL - 28
SP - 494
EP - 502
JO - International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants
JF - International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants
IS - 2
ER -