TY - JOUR
T1 - Research with women sexual assault survivors presenting for emergency care is safe
T2 - Results from a multi-site, prospective observational cohort study
AU - Short, Nicole A.
AU - Witkemper, Kristen D.
AU - Burud, Grace A.
AU - Lechner, Megan
AU - Bell, Kathy
AU - Black, Jenny
AU - Buchanan, Jennie
AU - Ho, Jeffrey
AU - Reed, Gordon
AU - Platt, Melissa
AU - Riviello, Ralph
AU - Martin, Sandra L.
AU - Liberzon, Israel
AU - Rauch, Sheila A.M.
AU - Bollen, Kenneth
AU - McLean, Samuel A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2024/10
Y1 - 2024/10
N2 - A barrier to research with sexual assault survivors is the concern that research participation might be a negative experience for participants. We report the experiences with research of adult women sexual assault survivors participating in a large-scale, multi-site, prospective observational study that enrolled participants at the time of presentation for emergency care. Participants (n = 706, M = 28 years of age; 57% white, 15% Black) self-reported their experience with research 1 week, 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year post-assault. The vast majority rated the research experience as positive (95–97%), reported no drawbacks (84–89%), and felt that participating was worth it (93–95%). Positive experiences with research remained stable across the year, were generally consistent across demographic and clinical groups, and were reflected in qualitative comments. Given the tremendous morbidity experienced by sexual assault survivors and lack of progress in developing improved treatments for this population, ethically-conducted research with sexual assault survivors receiving emergency care should be encouraged.
AB - A barrier to research with sexual assault survivors is the concern that research participation might be a negative experience for participants. We report the experiences with research of adult women sexual assault survivors participating in a large-scale, multi-site, prospective observational study that enrolled participants at the time of presentation for emergency care. Participants (n = 706, M = 28 years of age; 57% white, 15% Black) self-reported their experience with research 1 week, 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year post-assault. The vast majority rated the research experience as positive (95–97%), reported no drawbacks (84–89%), and felt that participating was worth it (93–95%). Positive experiences with research remained stable across the year, were generally consistent across demographic and clinical groups, and were reflected in qualitative comments. Given the tremendous morbidity experienced by sexual assault survivors and lack of progress in developing improved treatments for this population, ethically-conducted research with sexual assault survivors receiving emergency care should be encouraged.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85201000204&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85201000204&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.07.030
DO - 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.07.030
M3 - Article
C2 - 39141995
AN - SCOPUS:85201000204
SN - 0022-3956
VL - 178
SP - 156
EP - 163
JO - Journal of Psychiatric Research
JF - Journal of Psychiatric Research
ER -