TY - JOUR
T1 - Reduction of motion, truncation and flow artifacts using BLADE sequences in cervical spine MR imaging
AU - Lavdas, Eleftherios
AU - Mavroidis, Panayiotis
AU - Kostopoulos, Spiros
AU - Ninos, Constantin
AU - Strikou, Aspasia Dimitra
AU - Glotsos, Dimitrios
AU - Vlachopoulou, Anna
AU - Oikonomou, Georgia
AU - Economopoulos, Nikolaos
AU - Roka, Violeta
AU - Sakkas, Georgios K.
AU - Tsagkalis, Antonios
AU - Stathakis, Sotirios
AU - Papanikolaou, Nikos
AU - Batsikas, Georgios
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2015/2/1
Y1 - 2015/2/1
N2 - Purpose: To assess the efficacy of the BLADE technique (MR imaging with 'rotating blade-like k-space covering') to significantly reduce motion, truncation, flow and other artifacts in cervical spine compared to the conventional technique. Materials and methods: In eighty consecutive subjects, who had been routinely scanned for cervical spine examination, the following pairs of sequences were compared: a) T2 TSE SAG vs. T2 TSE SAG BLADE and b) T2 TIRM SAG vs. T2 TIRM SAG BLADE. A quantitative analysis was performed using the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) measures. A qualitative analysis was also performed by two radiologists, who graded seven image characteristics on a 5-point scale (0: non-visualization; 1: poor; 2: average; 3: good; 4: excellent). The observers also evaluated the presence of image artifacts (motion, truncation, flow, indentation). Results: In quantitative analysis, the CNR values of the CSF/SC between TIRM SAG and TIRM SAG BLADE were found to present statistically significant differences (p. <. 0.001). Regarding motion and truncation artifacts, the T2 TSE BLADE SAG was superior compared to the T2 TSE SAG, and the T2 TIRM BLADE SAG was superior compared to the T2 TIRM SAG. Regarding flow artifacts, T2 TIRM BLADE SAG eliminated more artifacts than T2 TIRM SAG. Conclusions: In cervical spine MRI, BLADE sequences appear to significantly reduce motion, truncation and flow artifacts and improve image quality. BLADE sequences are proposed to be used for uncooperative subjects. Nevertheless, more research needs to be done by testing additional specific pathologies.
AB - Purpose: To assess the efficacy of the BLADE technique (MR imaging with 'rotating blade-like k-space covering') to significantly reduce motion, truncation, flow and other artifacts in cervical spine compared to the conventional technique. Materials and methods: In eighty consecutive subjects, who had been routinely scanned for cervical spine examination, the following pairs of sequences were compared: a) T2 TSE SAG vs. T2 TSE SAG BLADE and b) T2 TIRM SAG vs. T2 TIRM SAG BLADE. A quantitative analysis was performed using the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) measures. A qualitative analysis was also performed by two radiologists, who graded seven image characteristics on a 5-point scale (0: non-visualization; 1: poor; 2: average; 3: good; 4: excellent). The observers also evaluated the presence of image artifacts (motion, truncation, flow, indentation). Results: In quantitative analysis, the CNR values of the CSF/SC between TIRM SAG and TIRM SAG BLADE were found to present statistically significant differences (p. <. 0.001). Regarding motion and truncation artifacts, the T2 TSE BLADE SAG was superior compared to the T2 TSE SAG, and the T2 TIRM BLADE SAG was superior compared to the T2 TIRM SAG. Regarding flow artifacts, T2 TIRM BLADE SAG eliminated more artifacts than T2 TIRM SAG. Conclusions: In cervical spine MRI, BLADE sequences appear to significantly reduce motion, truncation and flow artifacts and improve image quality. BLADE sequences are proposed to be used for uncooperative subjects. Nevertheless, more research needs to be done by testing additional specific pathologies.
KW - Artifact reduction
KW - BLADE sequences
KW - Cervical spine MR imaging
KW - Image quality
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84920680635&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84920680635&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.mri.2014.10.014
DO - 10.1016/j.mri.2014.10.014
M3 - Article
C2 - 25461304
AN - SCOPUS:84920680635
SN - 0730-725X
VL - 33
SP - 194
EP - 200
JO - Magnetic Resonance Imaging
JF - Magnetic Resonance Imaging
IS - 2
ER -