TY - JOUR
T1 - Reduced Efficacy of Low-dose Topical Steroids in Dry Eye Disease Associated With Graft-versus-Host Disease
AU - Yin, Jia
AU - Kheirkhah, Ahmad
AU - Dohlman, Thomas
AU - Saboo, Ujwala
AU - Dana, Reza
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding Support: Bausch & Lomb, Inc, Harvard Cornea Center of Excellence. Financial Disclosures: Jia Yin: National Institutes of Health (Bethesda, MD) research grant. Ahmad Kheirkhah: Eye Bank Association of America (Washington, DC) research grant, Eversight (Cleveland, OH) research grant. Reza Dana: National Institutes of Health (Bethesda, MD) research grant, Allergan (Madison, NJ) research funds, Shire (Lexington, MA) research funds and consultation, Dompe (Boston, MA) consultation. The following authors have no financial disclosures: Thomas Dohlman, and Ujwala Saboo. All authors attest that they meet the current ICMJE criteria for authorship.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2018/6
Y1 - 2018/6
N2 - Purpose: To compare the response of dry eye disease (DED) to treatment with topical steroid in patients with and without graft-vs-host disease (GVHD). Design: Post hoc analysis of a double-masked, randomized clinical trial. Methods: This single-center study included 42 patients with moderate-to-severe DED associated with (n = 21) or without (n = 21) chronic GVHD. In each group, patients received either loteprednol etabonate 0.5% ophthalmic suspension or artificial tears twice daily for 4 weeks. Clinical data, including Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire, corneal fluorescein staining (CFS), conjunctival lissamine green staining, tear break-up time (TBUT), and Schirmer test, were evaluated before and after treatment. Results: There were no significant differences in signs and symptoms of DED between the groups at baseline. In non-GVHD patients receiving loteprednol treatment, the average OSDI score decreased by 34% from 49.5 ± 5.9 to 32.6 ± 4.8 (mean ± standard error of the mean, P =.001) and the average CFS score decreased by 41% from 5.6 ± 0.6 to 3.3 ± 0.9 (P =.02). On the other hand, loteprednol treatment in GVHD patients resulted in minimal change in OSDI (59.2 ± 6.7 to 61.1 ± 7.1, 3% increase, P =.66) and CFS (5.5 ± 0.5 to 5.3 ± 1.1, 4% decrease, P =.85) scores. Treatment with artificial tears resulted in 22% decrease of OSDI (P =.10) and 32% decrease of CFS (P =.02) scores in non-GVHD patients, and had minimal effect in patients with GVHD. Conclusions: DED patients with ocular GVHD have a less favorable response to a low-dose topical steroid regimen compared with those without ocular GVHD even with similar baseline disease severity.
AB - Purpose: To compare the response of dry eye disease (DED) to treatment with topical steroid in patients with and without graft-vs-host disease (GVHD). Design: Post hoc analysis of a double-masked, randomized clinical trial. Methods: This single-center study included 42 patients with moderate-to-severe DED associated with (n = 21) or without (n = 21) chronic GVHD. In each group, patients received either loteprednol etabonate 0.5% ophthalmic suspension or artificial tears twice daily for 4 weeks. Clinical data, including Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire, corneal fluorescein staining (CFS), conjunctival lissamine green staining, tear break-up time (TBUT), and Schirmer test, were evaluated before and after treatment. Results: There were no significant differences in signs and symptoms of DED between the groups at baseline. In non-GVHD patients receiving loteprednol treatment, the average OSDI score decreased by 34% from 49.5 ± 5.9 to 32.6 ± 4.8 (mean ± standard error of the mean, P =.001) and the average CFS score decreased by 41% from 5.6 ± 0.6 to 3.3 ± 0.9 (P =.02). On the other hand, loteprednol treatment in GVHD patients resulted in minimal change in OSDI (59.2 ± 6.7 to 61.1 ± 7.1, 3% increase, P =.66) and CFS (5.5 ± 0.5 to 5.3 ± 1.1, 4% decrease, P =.85) scores. Treatment with artificial tears resulted in 22% decrease of OSDI (P =.10) and 32% decrease of CFS (P =.02) scores in non-GVHD patients, and had minimal effect in patients with GVHD. Conclusions: DED patients with ocular GVHD have a less favorable response to a low-dose topical steroid regimen compared with those without ocular GVHD even with similar baseline disease severity.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044954324&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85044954324&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ajo.2018.03.024
DO - 10.1016/j.ajo.2018.03.024
M3 - Article
C2 - 29572107
AN - SCOPUS:85044954324
SN - 0002-9394
VL - 190
SP - 17
EP - 23
JO - American journal of ophthalmology
JF - American journal of ophthalmology
ER -