Ir directamente a la navegación principal Ir directamente a la búsqueda Ir directamente al contenido principal

Process Evaluation of Making HEPA Policy Practice: A Group Randomized Trial

  • Robert G. Weaver
  • , Justin B. Moore
  • , Jennifer Huberty
  • , Darcy Freedman
  • , Brie Turner-McGrievy
  • , Aaron Beighle
  • , Diane Ward
  • , Russell Pate
  • , Ruth Saunders
  • , Keith Brazendale
  • , Jessica Chandler
  • , Rahma Ajja
  • , Becky Kyryliuk
  • , Michael W. Beets

Producción científica: Articlerevisión exhaustiva

Resumen

This study examines the link between implementation of Strategies to Enhance Practice (STEPs) and outcomes. Twenty after-school programs (ASPs) participated in an intervention to increase children’s accumulation of 30 minutes/day of moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) and quality of snacks served during program time. Outcomes were measured via accelerometer (MVPA) and direct observation (snacks). STEPs implementation data were collected via document review and direct observation. Based on implementation data, ASPs were divided into high/low implementers. Differences between high/low implementers’ change in percentage of boys accumulating 30 minutes/day of MVPA were observed. There was no difference between high/low implementers for girls. Days fruits and/or vegetables and water were served increased in the high/low implementation groups, while desserts and sugar-sweetened beverages decreased. Effect sizes (ES) for the difference in changes between the high and low group ranged from low (ES = 0.16) to high (ES = 0.97). Higher levels of implementation led to increased MVPA for boys, whereas girls MVPA benefited from the intervention regardless of high/low implementation. ESs of the difference between high/low implementers indicate that increased implementation of STEPs increases days healthier snacks are served. Programs in the high-implementation group implemented a variety of STEPs strategies, suggesting local adoption/adaptation is key to implementation.

Idioma originalEnglish (US)
Páginas (desde-hasta)631-647
Número de páginas17
PublicaciónHealth promotion practice
Volumen17
N.º5
DOI
EstadoPublished - sept 1 2016
Publicado de forma externa

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Nursing (miscellaneous)

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Process Evaluation of Making HEPA Policy Practice: A Group Randomized Trial'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto