TY - JOUR
T1 - Prehospital Whole Blood Administration Not Associated with Increased Transfusion Reactions
T2 - The Experience of a Metropolitan EMS Agency
AU - Raetz, Emily
AU - Wampler, David
AU - Greebon, Leslie
AU - Jenkins, Donald
AU - Brigmon, Erika
AU - Messenger, Jacquelyn
AU - Prajapati, Vipulkumar
AU - Bullock, William
AU - Rayas, Emmanuel
AU - Barry, Lauren
AU - Ferguson, Brian
AU - Ely, Rachel
AU - Winckler, Christopher
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© This work was authored as part of the Contributor’s official duties as an Employee of the United States Government and is therefore a work of the United States Government. In accordance with 17 U.S.C. 105, no copyright protection is available for such works under U.S. Law.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Objectives: Low titer O+ whole blood (LTO+WB) has been shown to improve outcomes in trauma patients and use is increasingly common. Studies on prehospital use and efficacy have been published throughout the literature, but few of these fully address the risks of transfusion reactions and other side effects. The focus of this study is to look at prehospital LTO+WB transfusions in trauma patients and review for transfusion reactions. Methods: This was a retrospective review of consecutive trauma patients who received prehospital LTO+WB over a 4.5-year period. We used EMS agency transfusion records and institutional blood bank data from two urban level I trauma centers for records on blood transfusion reactions. Excluded from the study were patients declared dead on arrival to the hospital, patients transfused for non-traumatic complaints, patients for whom hospital records were unavailable, and any transfusion reaction that occurred more than 10 days after the prehospital transfusion. Descriptive statistics were used for data analysis. Results: Of 1126 prehospital transfusions 572 met inclusion criteria. There were 2 (0.35%) suspected transfusion reactions, none of which were determined to be hemolytic reactions. There was 1 febrile non-hemolytic reaction on hospital day 1 and there was 1 allergic reaction with hives and shortness of breath that occurred on hospital day 1. Conclusions: Prehospital LTO+WB is safe to use and has a similar rate of transfusion reaction as when given in-hospital. Concerns about transfusion reactions caused by LTO+WB should not preclude its use prehospital. Regardless of the low incidence of transfusion reactions, prehospital personnel should be trained in their recognition and management. Limitations include retrospective study design and the inability to distinguish transfusion reactions from prehospital LTO+WB versus reaction to blood products transfused at the trauma center.
AB - Objectives: Low titer O+ whole blood (LTO+WB) has been shown to improve outcomes in trauma patients and use is increasingly common. Studies on prehospital use and efficacy have been published throughout the literature, but few of these fully address the risks of transfusion reactions and other side effects. The focus of this study is to look at prehospital LTO+WB transfusions in trauma patients and review for transfusion reactions. Methods: This was a retrospective review of consecutive trauma patients who received prehospital LTO+WB over a 4.5-year period. We used EMS agency transfusion records and institutional blood bank data from two urban level I trauma centers for records on blood transfusion reactions. Excluded from the study were patients declared dead on arrival to the hospital, patients transfused for non-traumatic complaints, patients for whom hospital records were unavailable, and any transfusion reaction that occurred more than 10 days after the prehospital transfusion. Descriptive statistics were used for data analysis. Results: Of 1126 prehospital transfusions 572 met inclusion criteria. There were 2 (0.35%) suspected transfusion reactions, none of which were determined to be hemolytic reactions. There was 1 febrile non-hemolytic reaction on hospital day 1 and there was 1 allergic reaction with hives and shortness of breath that occurred on hospital day 1. Conclusions: Prehospital LTO+WB is safe to use and has a similar rate of transfusion reaction as when given in-hospital. Concerns about transfusion reactions caused by LTO+WB should not preclude its use prehospital. Regardless of the low incidence of transfusion reactions, prehospital personnel should be trained in their recognition and management. Limitations include retrospective study design and the inability to distinguish transfusion reactions from prehospital LTO+WB versus reaction to blood products transfused at the trauma center.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85218700065&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85218700065&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/10903127.2025.2464247
DO - 10.1080/10903127.2025.2464247
M3 - Article
C2 - 39946294
AN - SCOPUS:85218700065
SN - 1090-3127
JO - Prehospital Emergency Care
JF - Prehospital Emergency Care
ER -