Predictive validity of cocaine, sedative, and alcohol dependence diagnoses

Michael Kidorf, Robert K. Brooner, L. Van King, Kenneth B. Stoller, Jennifer Wertz

Producción científica: Articlerevisión exhaustiva

37 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

This study examined the predictive validity of Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-III-R (Spitzer, Williams, Gibbon, and First, 1990) based substance dependence diagnoses (i.e., cocaine, sedative, and alcohol) for 518 opioid-dependent outpatients entering methadone maintenance. Patients were followed over I year of treatment, which involved daily methadone substitution supplemented by individual and group counseling. Urine specimens were tested randomly 1-4 times per month. Patients diagnosed with current cocaine, sedative, or alcohol dependence were more likely to use these drugs than were patients with past only or no dependence syndrome. Current cocaine dependence predicted early treatment dropout. The results demonstrate the predictive and discriminant validity of several substance dependence diagnoses common among patients in substance abuse or other psychiatric treatment settings.

Idioma originalEnglish (US)
Páginas (desde-hasta)168-173
Número de páginas6
PublicaciónJournal of consulting and clinical psychology
Volumen66
N.º1
DOI
EstadoPublished - feb 1998
Publicado de forma externa

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Clinical Psychology

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Predictive validity of cocaine, sedative, and alcohol dependence diagnoses'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto