Post-stroke upper limb rehabilitation using virtual reality interventions: Do outcome measures assess extent or type of motor improvement?

Sandeep K. Subramanian, MacKenzie K. Cross, Cole S. Hirschhauser, Vineet B.K. Johnson, Timothy A. Reistetter

Resultado de la investigación: Conference contribution

2 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

Post-stroke upper limb motor improvement continues to remain sub-optimal in a significant proportion of individuals sustaining a stroke. Efforts to enhance UL motor improvement have led to the use of evidence-based interventions including virtual reality technology. The effects of interventions on motor impairments, activity limitations and participation restrictions are commonly assesses using clinical outcomes. Majority of the clinical outcomes focus on the extent of motor improvement (i.e. how much). Information on the type (i.e. how) of recovery can be obtained by using a selected few clinical outcomes and movement pattern kinematic measures. The study objective was to characterize the outcomes used to assess the effects of virtual reality interventions in terms of quantifying the extent and type of upper limb motor improvement. We reviewed the published literature on the effects of virtual reality (VR) based interventions to enhance UL motor improvements. Outcomes from the retrieved studies were initially classified under the appropriate International Classification of Functioning categories. We then categorized the outcomes into those quantifying into type or extent of motor improvement based on existing evidence. We found 100 papers that investigated the effects of virtual reality interventions to enhance post-stroke UL motor improvement. Forty two different outcome measures were used across the 100 studies. Seventeen different outcomes assessed impairments, 16 were used to measure activity limitations and 6 measured participation restrictions and the effects of contextual factors. The Fugl Meyer Assessment, Wolf Motor Function Test and Stroke Impact Scale were most commonly used across the three categories. Of the retrieved 100 studies, 48 used an outcome that considered the type of recovery. Although a smaller proportion, 17 studies included outcomes of movement patterns. The use of outcomes considering the type of recovery is steadily increasing in studies using VR for post-stroke UL rehabilitation.

Idioma originalEnglish (US)
Título de la publicación alojadaICVR 2019 - International Conference on Virtual Rehabilitation
EditorialInstitute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
ISBN (versión digital)9781728112855
DOI
EstadoPublished - jul 2019
Evento2019 International Conference on Virtual Rehabilitation, ICVR 2019 - Tel Aviv, Israel
Duración: jul 21 2019jul 24 2019

Serie de la publicación

NombreInternational Conference on Virtual Rehabilitation, ICVR
Volumen2019-July
ISSN (versión digital)2331-9569

Conference

Conference2019 International Conference on Virtual Rehabilitation, ICVR 2019
País/TerritorioIsrael
CiudadTel Aviv
Período7/21/197/24/19

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering
  • Computer Networks and Communications

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Post-stroke upper limb rehabilitation using virtual reality interventions: Do outcome measures assess extent or type of motor improvement?'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto