TY - JOUR
T1 - Paramedics successfully perform humeral EZ-IO intraosseous access in adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients
AU - Wampler, David
AU - Schwartz, Daniel
AU - Shumaker, Joi
AU - Bolleter, Scotty
AU - Beckett, Robert
AU - Manifold, Craig
N1 - Funding Information:
This project was a component of a comprehensive quality assurance/quality improvement program and was funded by the Office of the Medical Director for San Antonio Fire Department. Vidacare Corporation provided supplies and administrative support. The authors appreciate the support and efforts of the men and women of the San Antonio Fire Department who strive to improve the management of cardiac arrest patients on a daily basis.
PY - 2012/9
Y1 - 2012/9
N2 - Objective: Studies on humeral placement of the EZ-IO (Vidacare, Shavano Park, TX, USA) have shown mixed results. We performed a study to determine the first-attempt success rate at humeral placement of the EZ-IO by paramedics among prehospital adult cardiac arrest patients. Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis of data prospectively collected over a 9-month period. Data are a subset extracted from a prehospital cardiac arrest study. The cohort consisted of adult cardiac arrest patients in whom the EZ-IO placement was attempted in the humerus by paramedics. Choice of vascular access was at the discretion of the paramedic; options included tibial or humeral EZ-IO and intravenous. Primary outcome is the percentage of successful placements (stable, flow, without extravasation) on first attempt. Secondary outcomes are overall successful placement, complications, and reason for failure. Data were collected during a post-cardiac arrest interview. Results: Humeral intraosseous (IO) access was attempted in 61% (n = 247) of 405 cardiac arrests evaluated with mean age of 63 (±16) years, 58% male. First-attempt successful placement was 91%. Successful placement was 94%, considering the second attempts. In the unsuccessful attempts, 2% reported obesity as the cause, 1% reported stable placement without flow, and 2% reported undocumented causes for failure. There were also 2% reports of successful placement with subsequent dislodgement. Conclusions: The results of this study suggest a high degree of paramedic proficiency in establishment of IO access in the proximal humerus of the out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Few complications suggest that proximal humeral IO access is a reliable method for vascular access in this patient population.
AB - Objective: Studies on humeral placement of the EZ-IO (Vidacare, Shavano Park, TX, USA) have shown mixed results. We performed a study to determine the first-attempt success rate at humeral placement of the EZ-IO by paramedics among prehospital adult cardiac arrest patients. Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis of data prospectively collected over a 9-month period. Data are a subset extracted from a prehospital cardiac arrest study. The cohort consisted of adult cardiac arrest patients in whom the EZ-IO placement was attempted in the humerus by paramedics. Choice of vascular access was at the discretion of the paramedic; options included tibial or humeral EZ-IO and intravenous. Primary outcome is the percentage of successful placements (stable, flow, without extravasation) on first attempt. Secondary outcomes are overall successful placement, complications, and reason for failure. Data were collected during a post-cardiac arrest interview. Results: Humeral intraosseous (IO) access was attempted in 61% (n = 247) of 405 cardiac arrests evaluated with mean age of 63 (±16) years, 58% male. First-attempt successful placement was 91%. Successful placement was 94%, considering the second attempts. In the unsuccessful attempts, 2% reported obesity as the cause, 1% reported stable placement without flow, and 2% reported undocumented causes for failure. There were also 2% reports of successful placement with subsequent dislodgement. Conclusions: The results of this study suggest a high degree of paramedic proficiency in establishment of IO access in the proximal humerus of the out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Few complications suggest that proximal humeral IO access is a reliable method for vascular access in this patient population.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84865454827&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84865454827&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ajem.2011.07.010
DO - 10.1016/j.ajem.2011.07.010
M3 - Article
C2 - 22030185
AN - SCOPUS:84865454827
SN - 0735-6757
VL - 30
SP - 1095
EP - 1099
JO - American Journal of Emergency Medicine
JF - American Journal of Emergency Medicine
IS - 7
ER -