TY - JOUR
T1 - Obesity classification in military personnel
T2 - A comparison of body fat, waist circumference, and body mass index measurements
AU - Heinrich, Katie M.
AU - Jitnarin, Nattinee
AU - Suminski, Richard R.
AU - Berkel, La Verne
AU - Hunter, Christine M.
AU - Alvarez, Lisa
AU - Brundige, Antionette R.
AU - Peterson, Alan L.
AU - Foreyt, John P.
AU - Haddock, C. Keith
AU - Poston, Walker S.C.
PY - 2008/1
Y1 - 2008/1
N2 - Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate obesity classifications from body fat percentage (BF%), body mass index (BMI), and waist circumference (WC). Methods: A total of 451 overweight/obese active duty military personnel completed all three assessments. Results: Most were obese (men, 81%; women, 98%) using National Institutes of Health (NIH) BF% standards (men, >25%; women, >30%). Using the higher World Health Organization (WHO) BF >35% standard, 86% of women were obese. BMI (55.5% and 51.4%) and WC (21.4% and 31.9%) obesity rates were substantially lower for men and women, respectively (p < 0.05). BMI/WC were accurate discriminators for BF% obesity (θ for all comparisons >0.75, p < 0.001). Optimal cutoff points were lower than NIH/WHO standards; WC = 100 cm and BMI = 29 maximized sensitivity and specificity for men, and WC = 79 cm and BMI = 25.5 (NIH) or WC = 83 cm and BMI = 26 (WHO) maximized sensitivity and specificity for women. Conclusions: Both WC and BMI measures had high rates of false negatives compared to BF%. However, at a population level, WC/BMI are useful obesity measures, demonstrating fair-to-high discriminatory power.
AB - Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate obesity classifications from body fat percentage (BF%), body mass index (BMI), and waist circumference (WC). Methods: A total of 451 overweight/obese active duty military personnel completed all three assessments. Results: Most were obese (men, 81%; women, 98%) using National Institutes of Health (NIH) BF% standards (men, >25%; women, >30%). Using the higher World Health Organization (WHO) BF >35% standard, 86% of women were obese. BMI (55.5% and 51.4%) and WC (21.4% and 31.9%) obesity rates were substantially lower for men and women, respectively (p < 0.05). BMI/WC were accurate discriminators for BF% obesity (θ for all comparisons >0.75, p < 0.001). Optimal cutoff points were lower than NIH/WHO standards; WC = 100 cm and BMI = 29 maximized sensitivity and specificity for men, and WC = 79 cm and BMI = 25.5 (NIH) or WC = 83 cm and BMI = 26 (WHO) maximized sensitivity and specificity for women. Conclusions: Both WC and BMI measures had high rates of false negatives compared to BF%. However, at a population level, WC/BMI are useful obesity measures, demonstrating fair-to-high discriminatory power.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=38149051313&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=38149051313&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.7205/MILMED.173.1.67
DO - 10.7205/MILMED.173.1.67
M3 - Article
C2 - 18251334
AN - SCOPUS:38149051313
SN - 0026-4075
VL - 173
SP - 67
EP - 73
JO - Military medicine
JF - Military medicine
IS - 1
ER -