Resumen
BACKGROUND: Putting evidence into practice at the point of care delivery requires an understanding of implementation strategies that work, in what context and how. OBJECTIVE: To identify methodological issues in implementation science using 4 studies as cases and make recommendations for further methods development. RESEARCH DESIGN: Four cases are presented and methodological issues identified. For each issue raised, evidence on the state of the science is described. RESULTS: Issues in implementation science identified include diverse conceptual frameworks, potential weaknesses in pragmatic study designs, and the paucity of standard concepts and measurement. CONCLUSIONS: Recommendations to advance methods in implementation include developing a core set of implementation concepts and metrics, generating standards for implementation methods including pragmatic trials, mixed methods designs, complex interventions and measurement, and endorsing reporting standards for implementation studies.
| Idioma original | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Páginas (desde-hasta) | S32-S40 |
| Publicación | Medical Care |
| Volumen | 51 |
| N.º | 4 SUPPL. 2 |
| DOI | |
| Estado | Published - abr 2013 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Huella
Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Methodology issues in implementation science'. En conjunto forman una huella única.Citar esto
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS