TY - JOUR
T1 - Metabolic syndrome and inflammatory biomarkers
T2 - A community-based cross-sectional study at the Framingham Heart Study
AU - Dallmeier, Dhayana
AU - Larson, Martin G.
AU - Vasan, Ramachandran S.
AU - Keaney, John F.
AU - Fontes, Joao D.
AU - Meigs, James B.
AU - Fox, Caroline S.
AU - Benjamin, Emelia J.
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute’s Framingham Heart Study N01-HC-25195; and by RO1-HL076784, RO1-HL064753, and R01-AG028321, the National Institutes of Health, National Center for Research Resources, General Clinical Research Centers Program, and by a Career Development Award from the American Diabetes Association (Dr. Meigs) Dr. Meigs was supported by NIDDK K24 DK080140. No other potential conflict of interest was reported. The authors declare that there is no duality of interest associated with this manuscript. An earlier version of this paper has been presented as an abstract at the 50th Cardiovascular Disease Epidemiology and Prevention Conference 2010, San Francisco, USA.
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - Background: Prior studies reported conflicting findings on the association between metabolic syndrome and inflammatory biomarkers. We tested the cross-sectional associations between metabolic syndrome and nine inflammatory markers. Methods. We measured C-reactive protein, CD40 ligand, interleukin-6, intercellular adhesion molecule-1, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, osteoprotegerin, P-selectin, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, and tumor necrosis factor receptor-2 in 2570 Framingham Offspring Study participants free of diabetes and cardiovascular disease at examination 7. Metabolic syndrome was defined by National Cholesterol Education Program criteria. We performed multivariable linear regressions for each biomarker with metabolic syndrome as the exposure adjusting for age, sex, smoking, aspirin use, and hormone replacement. We subsequently added to the models components of the metabolic syndrome as continuous traits plus lipid lowering and hypertension treatments. We considered P < 0.05 as statistically significant. Results: Metabolic syndrome was present in 984 (38%) participants and was statistically significantly associated with each biomarker (all P < 0.02) except osteoprotegerin. After adjusting for its component variables, the metabolic syndrome was associated only with P-selectin (1.06 fold higher in metabolic syndrome, 95% CI 1.02, 1.10, p = 0.005). Conclusions: Metabolic syndrome was associated with multiple inflammatory biomarkers. However, adjusting for each of its components eliminated the association with most inflammatory markers, except P-selectin. Our results suggest that the relation between metabolic syndrome and inflammation is largely accounted for by its components.
AB - Background: Prior studies reported conflicting findings on the association between metabolic syndrome and inflammatory biomarkers. We tested the cross-sectional associations between metabolic syndrome and nine inflammatory markers. Methods. We measured C-reactive protein, CD40 ligand, interleukin-6, intercellular adhesion molecule-1, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1, osteoprotegerin, P-selectin, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, and tumor necrosis factor receptor-2 in 2570 Framingham Offspring Study participants free of diabetes and cardiovascular disease at examination 7. Metabolic syndrome was defined by National Cholesterol Education Program criteria. We performed multivariable linear regressions for each biomarker with metabolic syndrome as the exposure adjusting for age, sex, smoking, aspirin use, and hormone replacement. We subsequently added to the models components of the metabolic syndrome as continuous traits plus lipid lowering and hypertension treatments. We considered P < 0.05 as statistically significant. Results: Metabolic syndrome was present in 984 (38%) participants and was statistically significantly associated with each biomarker (all P < 0.02) except osteoprotegerin. After adjusting for its component variables, the metabolic syndrome was associated only with P-selectin (1.06 fold higher in metabolic syndrome, 95% CI 1.02, 1.10, p = 0.005). Conclusions: Metabolic syndrome was associated with multiple inflammatory biomarkers. However, adjusting for each of its components eliminated the association with most inflammatory markers, except P-selectin. Our results suggest that the relation between metabolic syndrome and inflammation is largely accounted for by its components.
KW - Body mass index
KW - Inflammatory biomarkers
KW - Insulin resistance
KW - Metabolic syndrome
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84862336967&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84862336967&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/1758-5996-4-28
DO - 10.1186/1758-5996-4-28
M3 - Article
C2 - 22716219
AN - SCOPUS:84862336967
SN - 1758-5996
VL - 4
JO - Diabetology and Metabolic Syndrome
JF - Diabetology and Metabolic Syndrome
IS - 1
M1 - 28
ER -