TY - JOUR
T1 - Longitudinal correlations between MRE, MRI-PDFF, and liver histology in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis
T2 - Analysis of data from a phase II trial of selonsertib
AU - Jayakumar, Saumya
AU - Middleton, Michael S.
AU - Lawitz, Eric J.
AU - Mantry, Parvez S.
AU - Caldwell, Stephen H.
AU - Arnold, Hays
AU - Mae Diehl, Anna
AU - Ghalib, Reem
AU - Elkhashab, Magdy
AU - Abdelmalek, Manal F.
AU - Kowdley, Kris V.
AU - Stephen Djedjos, C.
AU - Xu, Ren
AU - Han, Ling
AU - Mani Subramanian, G.
AU - Myers, Robert P.
AU - Goodman, Zachary D.
AU - Afdhal, Nezam H.
AU - Charlton, Michael R.
AU - Sirlin, Claude B.
AU - Loomba, Rohit
N1 - Funding Information:
Supported by Gilead Sciences. Presented in part at the annual meeting of the European Association for the Study of the Liver held in Amsterdam on April 19-23, 2017, and the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases held in Washington, DC on October 20-24, 2017.
Funding Information:
Supported by Gilead Sciences . Presented in part at the annual meeting of the European Association for the Study of the Liver held in Amsterdam on April 19-23, 2017, and the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases held in Washington, DC on October 20-24, 2017.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 European Association for the Study of the Liver
PY - 2019/1
Y1 - 2019/1
N2 - Background & Aims: Non-invasive tools for monitoring treatment response and disease progression in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) are needed. Our objective was to evaluate the utility of magnetic resonance (MR)-based hepatic imaging measures for the assessment of liver histology in patients with NASH. Methods: We analyzed data from patients with NASH and stage 2 or 3 fibrosis enrolled in a phase II study of selonsertib. Pre- and post-treatment assessments included centrally read MR elastography (MRE)-estimated liver stiffness, MR imaging-estimated proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF), and liver biopsies evaluated according to the NASH Clinical Research Network classification and the non-alcoholic fatty liver disease activity score (NAS). Results: Among 54 patients with MRE and biopsies at baseline and week 24, 18 (33%) had fibrosis improvement (≥1-stage reduction) after undergoing 24 weeks of treatment with the study drug. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of MRE-stiffness to predict fibrosis improvement was 0.62 (95% CI 0.46–0.78) and the optimal threshold was a ≥0% relative reduction. At this threshold, MRE had 67% sensitivity, 64% specificity, 48% positive predictive value, 79% negative predictive value. Among 65 patients with MRI-PDFF and biopsies at baseline and week 24, a ≥1-grade reduction in steatosis was observed in 18 (28%). The AUROC of MRI-PDFF to predict steatosis response was 0.70 (95% CI 0.57–0.83) and the optimal threshold was a ≥0% relative reduction. At this threshold, MRI-PDFF had 89% sensitivity and 47% specificity, 39% positive predictive value, and 92% negative predictive value. Conclusions: These preliminary data support the further evaluation of MRE-stiffness and MRI-PDFF for the longitudinal assessment of histologic response in patients with NASH. Lay summary: Liver biopsy is a potentially painful and risky method to assess damage to the liver due to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). We analyzed data from a clinical trial to determine if 2 methods of magnetic resonance imaging – 1 to measure liver fat and 1 to measure liver fibrosis (scarring) – could potentially replace liver biopsy in evaluating NASH-related liver injury. Both imaging methods were correlated with biopsy in showing the effects of NASH on the liver.
AB - Background & Aims: Non-invasive tools for monitoring treatment response and disease progression in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) are needed. Our objective was to evaluate the utility of magnetic resonance (MR)-based hepatic imaging measures for the assessment of liver histology in patients with NASH. Methods: We analyzed data from patients with NASH and stage 2 or 3 fibrosis enrolled in a phase II study of selonsertib. Pre- and post-treatment assessments included centrally read MR elastography (MRE)-estimated liver stiffness, MR imaging-estimated proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF), and liver biopsies evaluated according to the NASH Clinical Research Network classification and the non-alcoholic fatty liver disease activity score (NAS). Results: Among 54 patients with MRE and biopsies at baseline and week 24, 18 (33%) had fibrosis improvement (≥1-stage reduction) after undergoing 24 weeks of treatment with the study drug. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of MRE-stiffness to predict fibrosis improvement was 0.62 (95% CI 0.46–0.78) and the optimal threshold was a ≥0% relative reduction. At this threshold, MRE had 67% sensitivity, 64% specificity, 48% positive predictive value, 79% negative predictive value. Among 65 patients with MRI-PDFF and biopsies at baseline and week 24, a ≥1-grade reduction in steatosis was observed in 18 (28%). The AUROC of MRI-PDFF to predict steatosis response was 0.70 (95% CI 0.57–0.83) and the optimal threshold was a ≥0% relative reduction. At this threshold, MRI-PDFF had 89% sensitivity and 47% specificity, 39% positive predictive value, and 92% negative predictive value. Conclusions: These preliminary data support the further evaluation of MRE-stiffness and MRI-PDFF for the longitudinal assessment of histologic response in patients with NASH. Lay summary: Liver biopsy is a potentially painful and risky method to assess damage to the liver due to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). We analyzed data from a clinical trial to determine if 2 methods of magnetic resonance imaging – 1 to measure liver fat and 1 to measure liver fibrosis (scarring) – could potentially replace liver biopsy in evaluating NASH-related liver injury. Both imaging methods were correlated with biopsy in showing the effects of NASH on the liver.
KW - Hepatic steatosis
KW - Liver biopsy
KW - Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease
KW - Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis
KW - Non-invasive tests
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054859369&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85054859369&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.09.024
DO - 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.09.024
M3 - Article
C2 - 30291868
AN - SCOPUS:85054859369
VL - 70
SP - 133
EP - 141
JO - Journal of Hepatology
JF - Journal of Hepatology
SN - 0168-8278
IS - 1
ER -