TY - JOUR
T1 - Living cellular construct for increasing the width of keratinized gingiva
T2 - Results from a randomized, within-patient, controlled trial
AU - McGuire, Michael K.
AU - Scheyer, E. Todd
AU - Nevins, Marc
AU - Neiva, Rodrigo
AU - Cochran, David L.
AU - Mellonig, James T.
AU - Giannobile, William V.
AU - Bates, Damien
PY - 2011/10
Y1 - 2011/10
N2 - Background: The standard of care for increasing keratinized gingiva adjacent to teeth that do not require root coverage is the free gingival graft (FGG). Apilot study indicated that the use of a living cellular construct (LCC) could be effective in this clinical scenario. Methods:Apivotal,multicenter, randomized, within-patient, controlled, open-label trialwas conducted (N = 96 patients). After removing the mucosa and keratinized gingiva from the test site, either an LCC or FGG was applied. The primary efficacy endpoint was the ability of the LCC to regenerate ≥2mmkeratinized gingiva at 6 months. Secondary measures were the same color and texture as the adjacent tissue, a 1-mm width of keratinized gingiva at 6 months, patient treatment preference, surgical site sensitivity at 1 week, and patient-reported pain after 3 days. Safety was assessed by reports of adverse events. Results: At 6 months, the LCC regenerated ≥2 mm of keratinized gingiva in 95.3% of patients (81 of 85 patients; P <0.001 versus a 50% predefined standard). As expected, the FGG generated more keratinized gingiva than the LCC (4.57 ± 1.0 mm versus 3.2 ± 1.1 mm, respectively). The gingiva regenerated with the LCC matched the color and texture of the adjacent gingiva. All patients achieved ≥1 mm keratinized gingiva with the LCC treatment by 6 months, and more patients preferred treatment with the LCC than with the FGG. No difference in sensitivity or pain was noted between the treatments. The treatments were well tolerated, and reported adverse events were typical for this type of periodontal surgery. Conclusion: The use of an LCC may provide a safe and effective therapy for augmenting the zone of keratinized gingiva.
AB - Background: The standard of care for increasing keratinized gingiva adjacent to teeth that do not require root coverage is the free gingival graft (FGG). Apilot study indicated that the use of a living cellular construct (LCC) could be effective in this clinical scenario. Methods:Apivotal,multicenter, randomized, within-patient, controlled, open-label trialwas conducted (N = 96 patients). After removing the mucosa and keratinized gingiva from the test site, either an LCC or FGG was applied. The primary efficacy endpoint was the ability of the LCC to regenerate ≥2mmkeratinized gingiva at 6 months. Secondary measures were the same color and texture as the adjacent tissue, a 1-mm width of keratinized gingiva at 6 months, patient treatment preference, surgical site sensitivity at 1 week, and patient-reported pain after 3 days. Safety was assessed by reports of adverse events. Results: At 6 months, the LCC regenerated ≥2 mm of keratinized gingiva in 95.3% of patients (81 of 85 patients; P <0.001 versus a 50% predefined standard). As expected, the FGG generated more keratinized gingiva than the LCC (4.57 ± 1.0 mm versus 3.2 ± 1.1 mm, respectively). The gingiva regenerated with the LCC matched the color and texture of the adjacent gingiva. All patients achieved ≥1 mm keratinized gingiva with the LCC treatment by 6 months, and more patients preferred treatment with the LCC than with the FGG. No difference in sensitivity or pain was noted between the treatments. The treatments were well tolerated, and reported adverse events were typical for this type of periodontal surgery. Conclusion: The use of an LCC may provide a safe and effective therapy for augmenting the zone of keratinized gingiva.
KW - Gingival recession
KW - Mouth mucosa
KW - Oral surgery
KW - Periodontal diseases
KW - Regenerative medicine
KW - Wound healing
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80053607431&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80053607431&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1902/jop.2011.100671
DO - 10.1902/jop.2011.100671
M3 - Article
C2 - 21513473
AN - SCOPUS:80053607431
SN - 0022-3492
VL - 82
SP - 1414
EP - 1423
JO - Journal of periodontology
JF - Journal of periodontology
IS - 10
ER -