TY - JOUR
T1 - Linear and Area Coverage With Closed Incision Negative Pressure Therapy Management
T2 - International Multidisciplinary Consensus Recommendations
AU - Singh, Devinder
AU - Alton, Timothy
AU - Alvand, Abtin
AU - Barbosa de Toledo, Paulo Roberto
AU - Chatterjee, Abhishek
AU - Dillavou, Ellen
AU - Djohan, Risal
AU - Gomez Ortega, Alba Viviana
AU - Pieri, Andrew
AU - Sumpio, Bauer
AU - Willy, Christian
AU - Zelle, Boris
AU - Cooper, H. John
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Author(s). International Wound Journal published by Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2025/6
Y1 - 2025/6
N2 - Closed incision negative pressure therapy (ciNPT) with foam dressings has received broad recognition for its ability to support incision healing for a variety of surgical procedures. Over time, these dressings have evolved to include linear and ‘area’ shapes to better conform to different incision types and surface geometries. To address new studies on these configurations and provide guidance for dressing selection, an international, multidisciplinary panel of experts was convened. The panel reviewed recent publications on ciNPT with reticulated open cell foam (ROCF) dressings, shared their cases and experiences and engaged in roundtable discussions on benefits, drawbacks and technical challenges. Topics were ranked by importance and refined into potential consensus statements. These were shared for anonymous feedback, requiring 80% agreement for consensus. This manuscript establishes 12 consensus statements regarding risk factors supporting the use of ciNPT, conditions supporting preference of linear or area ciNPT dressings and tips for practical application of ciNPT with ROCF dressings. While this consensus panel expands on previous publications to aid clinicians' decision-making, further research is needed to refine recommendations and identify the strengths and limitations of ciNPT. Continued multidisciplinary collaboration will ensure ciNPT remains vital for improving surgical outcomes and patient care.
AB - Closed incision negative pressure therapy (ciNPT) with foam dressings has received broad recognition for its ability to support incision healing for a variety of surgical procedures. Over time, these dressings have evolved to include linear and ‘area’ shapes to better conform to different incision types and surface geometries. To address new studies on these configurations and provide guidance for dressing selection, an international, multidisciplinary panel of experts was convened. The panel reviewed recent publications on ciNPT with reticulated open cell foam (ROCF) dressings, shared their cases and experiences and engaged in roundtable discussions on benefits, drawbacks and technical challenges. Topics were ranked by importance and refined into potential consensus statements. These were shared for anonymous feedback, requiring 80% agreement for consensus. This manuscript establishes 12 consensus statements regarding risk factors supporting the use of ciNPT, conditions supporting preference of linear or area ciNPT dressings and tips for practical application of ciNPT with ROCF dressings. While this consensus panel expands on previous publications to aid clinicians' decision-making, further research is needed to refine recommendations and identify the strengths and limitations of ciNPT. Continued multidisciplinary collaboration will ensure ciNPT remains vital for improving surgical outcomes and patient care.
KW - expert opinion
KW - negative pressure wound therapy
KW - risk factors
KW - surgical wound
KW - wound healing
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105006682938
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=105006682938&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/iwj.70677
DO - 10.1111/iwj.70677
M3 - Article
C2 - 40432310
AN - SCOPUS:105006682938
SN - 1742-4801
VL - 22
JO - International Wound Journal
JF - International Wound Journal
IS - 6
M1 - e70677
ER -