TY - JOUR
T1 - Islet transplantation imaging in vivo
AU - Zheng, Lei
AU - Wang, Yinghao
AU - Yang, Bin
AU - Zhang, Bo
AU - Wu, Yulian
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Zheng et al.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Although islet transplantation plays an effective and powerful role in the treat-ment of diabetes, a large amount of islet grafts are lost at an early stage due to instant blood-mediated inflammatory reactions, immune rejection, and β-cell toxicity resulting from immunosuppressive agents. Timely intervention based on the viability and function of the transplanted islets at an early stage is crucial. Various islet transplantation imaging techni-ques are available for monitoring the conditions of post-transplanted islets. Due to the development of various imaging modalities and the continuous study of contrast agents, non-invasive islet transplantation imaging in vivo has made great progress. The tracing and functional evaluation of transplanted islets in vivo have thus become possible. However, most studies on contrast agent and imaging modalities are limited to animal experiments, and long-term toxicity and stability need further evaluation. Accordingly, the clinical application of the current achievements still requires a large amount of effort. In this review, we discuss the contrast agents for MRI, SPECT/PET, BLI/FI, US, MPI, PAI, and multimodal imaging. We further summarize the advantages and limitations of various molecular imaging methods.
AB - Although islet transplantation plays an effective and powerful role in the treat-ment of diabetes, a large amount of islet grafts are lost at an early stage due to instant blood-mediated inflammatory reactions, immune rejection, and β-cell toxicity resulting from immunosuppressive agents. Timely intervention based on the viability and function of the transplanted islets at an early stage is crucial. Various islet transplantation imaging techni-ques are available for monitoring the conditions of post-transplanted islets. Due to the development of various imaging modalities and the continuous study of contrast agents, non-invasive islet transplantation imaging in vivo has made great progress. The tracing and functional evaluation of transplanted islets in vivo have thus become possible. However, most studies on contrast agent and imaging modalities are limited to animal experiments, and long-term toxicity and stability need further evaluation. Accordingly, the clinical application of the current achievements still requires a large amount of effort. In this review, we discuss the contrast agents for MRI, SPECT/PET, BLI/FI, US, MPI, PAI, and multimodal imaging. We further summarize the advantages and limitations of various molecular imaging methods.
KW - Contrast agent
KW - Imaging modality
KW - Islet transplantation
KW - Multimodal imaging
KW - Non-invasive imaging
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85091272575
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85091272575#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.2147/DMSO.S263253
DO - 10.2147/DMSO.S263253
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85091272575
SN - 1178-7007
VL - 13
SP - 3301
EP - 3311
JO - Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity
JF - Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity
ER -