Invited commentary: Future of population studies - Defining research priorities and processes

Ramachandran S. Vasan, Aaron R. Folsom

Resultado de la investigación: Review articlerevisión exhaustiva

5 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

In this issue of the Journal, an expert panel offers 7 recommendations on how population studies supported by National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute contracts might be strategically transformed (Am J Epidemiol. 2015;181(6):363-368). The Institute and its external advisors seemingly established this panel of epidemiologists and nonepidemiologists primarily to find ways to save research costs. Although the working group's recommendations offer reasonable approaches, we believe that, even in tough fiscal times, the main drivers of cardiovascular epidemiologic research must remain 1) scientific questions that are important and 2) study designs to match these. Although cardiovascular epidemiology admittedly is often redundant and needs to be more efficient, undue focus on administrative efficiency and cost savings will not necessarily guarantee cutting-edge population research.

Idioma originalEnglish (US)
Páginas (desde-hasta)369-371
Número de páginas3
PublicaciónAmerican journal of epidemiology
Volumen181
N.º6
DOI
EstadoPublished - dic. 8 2015
Publicado de forma externa

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Invited commentary: Future of population studies - Defining research priorities and processes'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto