Intravenous regional sympatholysis: A double-blind comparison of guanethidine, reserpine, and normal saline

Janna Blanchard, Somayaji Ramamurthy, Nicolas Walsh, Joan Hoffman, Lawrence Schoenfeld

Producción científica: Articlerevisión exhaustiva

110 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

This double-blind, randomized study was designed to compare the effectiveness of intravenous regional sympatholysis using guanethidine, reserpine and normal saline. Twenty-one patients with reflex sympathetic dystrophy of an upper or lower extremity were enrolled and received intravenous regional blockade (IVRB) with one of the three medications. There was significant pain relief in all three groups at 30 min. There were no significant differences among the three groups in the degree of pain relief, the number of patients obtaining pain relief in the 30 min after the block, or the number of patients reporting more than 50% pain relief for more than 24 hr. The saline group's high rate of pain relief could be partially due to a mechanism of tourniquet-induced analgesia.

Idioma originalEnglish (US)
Páginas (desde-hasta)357-361
Número de páginas5
PublicaciónJournal of Pain and Symptom Management
Volumen5
N.º6
DOI
EstadoPublished - dic 1990

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Neurology
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
  • General Nursing

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Intravenous regional sympatholysis: A double-blind comparison of guanethidine, reserpine, and normal saline'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto