Resumen
In this paper we describe the problem of intentionality for modern theories of concepts and propose that taking an Aristotelian-Thomistic (A-T) approach to concepts helps to alleviate this problem. We begin by describing some recent problems within the psychological literature on concepts that might lead one to adopt an A-T approach to concepts (see Spalding and Gagné, 2013). We then discuss Quine's dilemma of intentionality and show how that dilemma plays out across a number of possible approaches to philosophy and psychology including psycho-functionalism, the current default philosophy of psychology. We then describe how the A-T approach to concepts deals with the problem of intentionality and suggest that it may provide a better way of thinking about intentionality than other modern approaches. We end by discussing some possible objections to the approach. We show that the A-T approach is, perhaps, surprisingly compatible with other recent work in psychology and that taking this approach to concepts and intentionality does not introduce Cartesian problems of dualism into modern psychology.
| Idioma original | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Páginas (desde-hasta) | 245-262 |
| Número de páginas | 18 |
| Publicación | Journal of Mind and Behavior |
| Volumen | 35 |
| N.º | 4 |
| Estado | Published - jun 1 2014 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
Huella
Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Intentionality and the Aristotelian-Thomistic view of concepts'. En conjunto forman una huella única.Citar esto
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS