TY - JOUR
T1 - Inpatient Culture and Satisfaction With Care
T2 - A Novel Perspective
AU - Perkins, Henry S.
AU - Freed, Alisa A.
AU - Cortez, Josie D.
AU - Hazuda, Helen P.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Southern Society for Clinical Investigation
PY - 2021/2
Y1 - 2021/2
N2 - Background: Hospital professionals must attend to patients’ satisfaction with care. Along with technical quality of care, patients’ personal characteristics may affect that satisfaction, but standard demographics research often overlooks cultural links. Methods: We, therefore, asked 58 San Antonio, Texas, inpatients their satisfaction with care and examined responses for attitudes related to ethnic—Mexican-American (MA), Euro-American (EA), or African-American (AA)—and gender cultures. Results: Many attitudes occurred widely. Most respondents expected doctors to attend them faithfully, inform them honestly, and pursue their needs and wishes singularly. Most also trusted doctors, and expressed satisfaction with doctors’ generally exemplary character and service ethic. But most respondents also feared hospital treatments, and some expressed dissatisfaction that doctors had inadequately informed them or ignored their wishes. Only rare attitudes distinguished particular ethnic-gender groups. Unlike other groups few EA or AA men expressed dissatisfactions. But some MA and EA women said hospitals use too many caregivers or coordinate care poorly. Furthermore, most AA women expressed no explicit trust in doctors, and most EA women expressed actual distrust of doctors, often doubting their technical competence or altruism. Conclusions: These findings suggest a novel perspective: a unique inpatient culture, largely unaffected by ethnic group or gender. Patients interpret their hospital experience through that culture. Hospital professionals might respond with both universal measures (addressing patients’ fears, dissatisfactions, and distrust) and targeted ones (explicitly asking EA and AA men about dissatisfactions, and AA and EA women about distrust). Such culturally grounded measures may help maintain or increase inpatients’ satisfaction.
AB - Background: Hospital professionals must attend to patients’ satisfaction with care. Along with technical quality of care, patients’ personal characteristics may affect that satisfaction, but standard demographics research often overlooks cultural links. Methods: We, therefore, asked 58 San Antonio, Texas, inpatients their satisfaction with care and examined responses for attitudes related to ethnic—Mexican-American (MA), Euro-American (EA), or African-American (AA)—and gender cultures. Results: Many attitudes occurred widely. Most respondents expected doctors to attend them faithfully, inform them honestly, and pursue their needs and wishes singularly. Most also trusted doctors, and expressed satisfaction with doctors’ generally exemplary character and service ethic. But most respondents also feared hospital treatments, and some expressed dissatisfaction that doctors had inadequately informed them or ignored their wishes. Only rare attitudes distinguished particular ethnic-gender groups. Unlike other groups few EA or AA men expressed dissatisfactions. But some MA and EA women said hospitals use too many caregivers or coordinate care poorly. Furthermore, most AA women expressed no explicit trust in doctors, and most EA women expressed actual distrust of doctors, often doubting their technical competence or altruism. Conclusions: These findings suggest a novel perspective: a unique inpatient culture, largely unaffected by ethnic group or gender. Patients interpret their hospital experience through that culture. Hospital professionals might respond with both universal measures (addressing patients’ fears, dissatisfactions, and distrust) and targeted ones (explicitly asking EA and AA men about dissatisfactions, and AA and EA women about distrust). Such culturally grounded measures may help maintain or increase inpatients’ satisfaction.
KW - Cross-cultural comparisons
KW - Physician-patient relations
KW - Satisfaction with inpatient care
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85093687344&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85093687344&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.amjms.2020.08.028
DO - 10.1016/j.amjms.2020.08.028
M3 - Article
C2 - 33097197
AN - SCOPUS:85093687344
SN - 0002-9629
VL - 361
SP - 226
EP - 232
JO - American Journal of the Medical Sciences
JF - American Journal of the Medical Sciences
IS - 2
ER -