Resumen
Word Choice (WC), a test in the Advanced Clinical Solutions package for Wechsler measures, was examined in two studies. The first study compared WC to the Recognition Memory Test-Words (RMT-W) in a clinical sample (N = 46). WC scores were significantly higher than RMT-W scores overall and in sample subsets grouped by separate validity indicators. In item-level analyses, WC items demonstrated lower frequency, greater imageability, and higher concreteness than RMT-W items. The second study explored WC classification accuracy in a different clinical sample grouped by separate validity indicators into Pass (n = 54), Fail-1 (n = 17), and Fail-2 (n = 8) groups. WC scores were significantly higher in the Pass group (M = 49.1, SD = 1.9) than in the Fail-1 (M = 46.0, SD = 5.3) and Fail-2 (M = 44.1, SD = 4.8) groups. WC demonstrated area under the curve of.81 in classifying Pass and Fail-2 participants. Using the test manual cutoff associated with a 10% false positive rate, sensitivity was 38% and specificity was 96% in Pass and Fail-2 groups with 24% of Fail-1 participants scoring below cutoff. WC may be optimally used in combination with other measures given observed sensitivity.
| Idioma original | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Páginas (desde-hasta) | 1278-1294 |
| Número de páginas | 17 |
| Publicación | Clinical Neuropsychologist |
| Volumen | 28 |
| N.º | 8 |
| DOI | |
| Estado | Published - nov 17 2014 |
| Publicado de forma externa | Sí |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
- Psychiatry and Mental health
- Clinical Psychology
- Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
Huella
Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Further consideration of advanced clinical solutions word choice: Comparison to the recognition memory test-words and classification accuracy in a clinical sample'. En conjunto forman una huella única.Citar esto
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS