Esource-enabled vs. Traditional clinical trial data collection methods: A site-level economic analysis

Eric L. Eisenstein, Maryam Y. Garza, Mitra Rocca, Gideon S. Gordon, Meredith Zozus

Producción científica: Conference contribution

6 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

Directly extracting data from site electronic health records for updating clinical trial databases (eSource) can reduce site data collection times and errors. We conducted a study to determine clinical trial characteristics that make eSource vs. traditional data collection methods more and less economically attractive. The number of patients a site enrolls, the number of study data elements, study coordinator data collection times, and the percent of study data elements that can be extracted via eSource software all impact eSource economic attractiveness. However, these factors may not impact all clinical trial designs in the same way.

Idioma originalEnglish (US)
Título de la publicación alojadaDigital Personalized Health and Medicine - Proceedings of MIE 2020
EditoresLouise B. Pape-Haugaard, Christian Lovis, Inge Cort Madsen, Patrick Weber, Per Hostrup Nielsen, Philip Scott
EditorialIOS Press
Páginas961-965
Número de páginas5
ISBN (versión digital)9781643680828
DOI
EstadoPublished - jun 16 2020
Evento30th Medical Informatics Europe Conference, MIE 2020 - Geneva, Switzerland
Duración: abr 28 2020may 1 2020

Serie de la publicación

NombreStudies in Health Technology and Informatics
Volumen270
ISSN (versión impresa)0926-9630
ISSN (versión digital)1879-8365

Conference

Conference30th Medical Informatics Europe Conference, MIE 2020
País/TerritorioSwitzerland
CiudadGeneva
Período4/28/205/1/20

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Health Informatics
  • Health Information Management

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Esource-enabled vs. Traditional clinical trial data collection methods: A site-level economic analysis'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto