TY - JOUR
T1 - Elacestrant (oral selective estrogen receptor degrader) Versus Standard Endocrine Therapy for Estrogen Receptor-Positive, Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Advanced Breast Cancer
T2 - Results From the Randomized Phase III EMERALD Trial
AU - Bidard, Francois Clement
AU - Kaklamani, Virginia G.
AU - Neven, Patrick
AU - Streich, Guillermo
AU - Montero, Alberto J.
AU - Forget, Frédéric
AU - Mouret-Reynier, Marie Ange
AU - Sohn, Joo Hyuk
AU - Taylor, Donatienne
AU - Harnden, Kathleen K.
AU - Khong, Hung
AU - Kocsis, Judit
AU - Dalenc, Florence
AU - Dillon, Patrick M.
AU - Babu, Sunil
AU - Waters, Simon
AU - Deleu, Ines
AU - García Sáenz, José A.
AU - Bria, Emilio
AU - Cazzaniga, Marina
AU - Lu, Janice
AU - Aftimos, Philippe
AU - Cortés, Javier
AU - Liu, Shubin
AU - Tonini, Giulia
AU - Laurent, Dirk
AU - Habboubi, Nassir
AU - Conlan, Maureen G.
AU - Bardia, Aditya
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank Mark Phillips, PharmD, and Laura Evans, PharmD, of Phillips Gilmore Oncology Communications Inc, for professional assistance with manuscript preparation. Financial support for writing and editorial services was provided by Radius Health, Inc. and Berlin Chemie/Menarini Group.
Publisher Copyright:
© American Society of Clinical Oncology.
PY - 2022/5/1
Y1 - 2022/5/1
N2 - PURPOSEPatients with pretreated estrogen receptor (ER)-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced breast cancer have poor prognosis. Elacestrant is a novel, oral selective ER degrader that demonstrated activity in early studies.METHODSThis randomized, open-label, phase III trial enrolled patients with ER-positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer who had one-two lines of endocrine therapy, required pretreatment with a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor, and ≤ 1 chemotherapy. Patients were randomly assigned to elacestrant 400 mg orally once daily or standard-of-care (SOC) endocrine monotherapy. Primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review in all patients and patients with detectable ESR1 mutations.RESULTSPatients were randomly assigned to elacestrant (n = 239) or SOC (n = 238). ESR1 mutation was detected in 47.8% of patients, and 43.4% received two prior endocrine therapies. PFS was prolonged in all patients (hazard ratio = 0.70; 95% CI, 0.55 to 0.88; P =.002) and patients with ESR1 mutation (hazard ratio = 0.55; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.77; P =.0005). Treatment-related grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in 7.2% receiving elacestrant and 3.1% receiving SOC. Treatment-related adverse events leading to treatment discontinuations were 3.4% in the elacestrant arm versus 0.9% in SOC. Nausea of any grade occurred in 35.0% receiving elacestrant and 18.8% receiving SOC (grade 3/4, 2.5% and 0.9%, respectively).CONCLUSIONElacestrant is the first oral selective ER degrader demonstrating a significant PFS improvement versus SOC both in the overall population and in patients with ESR1 mutations with manageable safety in a phase III trial for patients with ER-positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer.
AB - PURPOSEPatients with pretreated estrogen receptor (ER)-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced breast cancer have poor prognosis. Elacestrant is a novel, oral selective ER degrader that demonstrated activity in early studies.METHODSThis randomized, open-label, phase III trial enrolled patients with ER-positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer who had one-two lines of endocrine therapy, required pretreatment with a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor, and ≤ 1 chemotherapy. Patients were randomly assigned to elacestrant 400 mg orally once daily or standard-of-care (SOC) endocrine monotherapy. Primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review in all patients and patients with detectable ESR1 mutations.RESULTSPatients were randomly assigned to elacestrant (n = 239) or SOC (n = 238). ESR1 mutation was detected in 47.8% of patients, and 43.4% received two prior endocrine therapies. PFS was prolonged in all patients (hazard ratio = 0.70; 95% CI, 0.55 to 0.88; P =.002) and patients with ESR1 mutation (hazard ratio = 0.55; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.77; P =.0005). Treatment-related grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in 7.2% receiving elacestrant and 3.1% receiving SOC. Treatment-related adverse events leading to treatment discontinuations were 3.4% in the elacestrant arm versus 0.9% in SOC. Nausea of any grade occurred in 35.0% receiving elacestrant and 18.8% receiving SOC (grade 3/4, 2.5% and 0.9%, respectively).CONCLUSIONElacestrant is the first oral selective ER degrader demonstrating a significant PFS improvement versus SOC both in the overall population and in patients with ESR1 mutations with manageable safety in a phase III trial for patients with ER-positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85132536280&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85132536280&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1200/JCO.22.00338
DO - 10.1200/JCO.22.00338
M3 - Article
C2 - 35584336
AN - SCOPUS:85132536280
SN - 0732-183X
VL - 32
JO - Journal of Clinical Oncology
JF - Journal of Clinical Oncology
M1 - JCO.22.00338
ER -