TY - JOUR
T1 - Dual-energy estimates of volumetric bone mineral densities in the lumbar spine using quantitative computed tomography better correlate with fracture properties when compared to single-energy BMD outcomes
AU - Cataño Jimenez, Simon
AU - Saldarriaga, Sebastian
AU - Chaput, Christopher D.
AU - Giambini, Hugo
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2020/1
Y1 - 2020/1
N2 - It is estimated that over 200 million people worldwide are affected by osteoporosis. Vertebral fracture risk prediction using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is confounded by limitations of the technology, such as 2D measurements of bone mineral density (BMD), inability to measure bone distribution and heterogeneity, and potential overestimations of BMD due to degenerative diseases. To overcome these shortcomings, single energy (SE) quantitative computed tomography (QCT) imaging estimates of Hounsfield units (HU) and volumetric BMD have been implemented as alternative methodologies for assessing fracture risk. However, marrow fat within the vertebrae can highly affect the vBMD and fracture properties estimations. To address this issue, 54 vertebrae were dissected from nine cadaveric spines and scanned using SE-QCT (120kVp) and dual energy (DE)-QCT (80/140 kVp), with the latter accounting for marrow fat within the vertebrae. The vertebrae were then scanned using DXA and subjected to mechanical testing to obtain fracture properties. aBMD outcomes from DXA showed a better correlation with DE-QCT vBMD versus SE outcomes [DE: aBMD vs. vBMD (R2: 0.61); SE: aBMD vs. vBMD (R2: 0.27)]. SE-QCT underestimated vertebral vBMD by -56% (p < 0.0001) when compared to DE-QCT. vBMD estimates from SE-QCT could predict 45% and 37% of the vertebral failure loads and stiffness, respectively, compared to 67% and 46% from DE-QCT. DE-QCT vBMD outcomes highly correlated with fracture properties of vertebrae as compared to SE-QCT metrics. As DE scanning has the ability to correct for the effects of bone marrow fat, estimated vBMD from SE-QCT were significantly underestimated compared to DE-QCT. Dual energy CT scanning has the potential to more accurately predict vertebral failure and aid the clinician in the evaluation of appropriate interventions. Future studies should consider implementing DE-QCT in their fracture assessment.
AB - It is estimated that over 200 million people worldwide are affected by osteoporosis. Vertebral fracture risk prediction using dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is confounded by limitations of the technology, such as 2D measurements of bone mineral density (BMD), inability to measure bone distribution and heterogeneity, and potential overestimations of BMD due to degenerative diseases. To overcome these shortcomings, single energy (SE) quantitative computed tomography (QCT) imaging estimates of Hounsfield units (HU) and volumetric BMD have been implemented as alternative methodologies for assessing fracture risk. However, marrow fat within the vertebrae can highly affect the vBMD and fracture properties estimations. To address this issue, 54 vertebrae were dissected from nine cadaveric spines and scanned using SE-QCT (120kVp) and dual energy (DE)-QCT (80/140 kVp), with the latter accounting for marrow fat within the vertebrae. The vertebrae were then scanned using DXA and subjected to mechanical testing to obtain fracture properties. aBMD outcomes from DXA showed a better correlation with DE-QCT vBMD versus SE outcomes [DE: aBMD vs. vBMD (R2: 0.61); SE: aBMD vs. vBMD (R2: 0.27)]. SE-QCT underestimated vertebral vBMD by -56% (p < 0.0001) when compared to DE-QCT. vBMD estimates from SE-QCT could predict 45% and 37% of the vertebral failure loads and stiffness, respectively, compared to 67% and 46% from DE-QCT. DE-QCT vBMD outcomes highly correlated with fracture properties of vertebrae as compared to SE-QCT metrics. As DE scanning has the ability to correct for the effects of bone marrow fat, estimated vBMD from SE-QCT were significantly underestimated compared to DE-QCT. Dual energy CT scanning has the potential to more accurately predict vertebral failure and aid the clinician in the evaluation of appropriate interventions. Future studies should consider implementing DE-QCT in their fracture assessment.
KW - DXA
KW - Osteoporosis
KW - Prediction
KW - QCT
KW - Vertebral fracture
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074786361&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85074786361&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.bone.2019.115100
DO - 10.1016/j.bone.2019.115100
M3 - Article
C2 - 31678491
AN - SCOPUS:85074786361
SN - 8756-3282
VL - 130
JO - Bone
JF - Bone
M1 - 115100
ER -