Does functionalism offer an adequate account of cognitive psychology?

James M. Stedman, Thomas L. Spalding, Christina L. Gagné

Resultado de la investigación: Articlerevisión exhaustiva

2 Citas (Scopus)


The majority of cognitive psychologists, when pressed, would hold for scientific realism as their philosophy of science and ontological position. However, it is functionalism which undergirds the ontology of scientific realism. Moreover, functionalists claim that cognitive psychology, including sensation, perception, memory, and the higher cognitive functions, can be fully accounted for by functionalism. The question is then: Is functionalism up to the task? Recently, Spalding and Gagné (2013) made the case that concept formation, a key element in all aspects of higher order cognition, can be better accounted for by an Aristotelian-Thomistic (A - T) meta-theory, and Stedman (2013) pointed out parallels between Aristotle's model and current cognitive psychology. This essay argues that the A - T viewpoint is a better model for all elements of cognitive psychology.

Idioma originalEnglish (US)
Páginas (desde-hasta)15-30
Número de páginas16
PublicaciónJournal of Mind and Behavior
EstadoPublished - dic 1 2016

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)


Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Does functionalism offer an adequate account of cognitive psychology?'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto