Resumen
Guidelines are increasingly being used for clinical decision-making. Such guidelines are usually based on meta-analyses, which are generally derived from RCTs. However, their interpretations are often hindered as they do not always consider current clinical relevance. Analyses of RCTs assessing analgesic efficacy of advanced regional analgesic techniques in knee arthroplasty show that the majority of trials do not include a package of basic analgesics such as paracetamol, NSAIDs or cyclooxygenase-2 specific inhibitors, dexamethasone, and local infiltration analgesia in the comparator group. Consequently, the current approach to analyse meta-analyses of pain interventions is not optimal, and may lead to inadequate or inappropriate conclusions and clinical guidance.
| Idioma original | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Páginas (desde-hasta) | 142-144 |
| Número de páginas | 3 |
| Publicación | British Journal of Anaesthesia |
| Volumen | 129 |
| N.º | 2 |
| DOI | |
| Estado | Published - ago 2022 |
| Publicado de forma externa | Sí |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
Huella
Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Critical appraisal of randomised trials assessing regional analgesic interventions for knee arthroplasty: implications for postoperative pain guidelines development'. En conjunto forman una huella única.Citar esto
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS