TY - JOUR
T1 - Creating a practice-based research network from scratch
T2 - Where do i begin?
AU - Hayes, Holly
AU - Burge, Sandra
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - Background: As of today, 50% of Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA)-funded Academic Health Centers are engaging community clinicians through the practicebased research network (PBRN) mechanism, which has been identified as a best practice by the CTSA National Leadership. A PBRN is an organization of community clinicians who work together with researchers to answer meaningful questions that will improve patient care. Methods: This paper outlines the steps that were led to success during the University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio's journey of developing four PBRNs over 3 years: (1) identifying network directors; (2) deciding who to include; (3) obtaining recruitment lists; (4) sending out mailers; (5) hosting the first PBRN meeting; (6) gaining institutional review board (IRB) approval; (7) launching a simple study; (8) returning the findings; and (9) formalizing the PBRN and moving forward. Results: CTSAs will continue to seek ways to effectively engage community members in the clinical translation process. Conclusions: PBRNs are a promising laboratory for generating research questions directly from clinicians, conducting meaningful research, and then disseminating the findings to the larger community to accelerate positive change.
AB - Background: As of today, 50% of Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA)-funded Academic Health Centers are engaging community clinicians through the practicebased research network (PBRN) mechanism, which has been identified as a best practice by the CTSA National Leadership. A PBRN is an organization of community clinicians who work together with researchers to answer meaningful questions that will improve patient care. Methods: This paper outlines the steps that were led to success during the University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio's journey of developing four PBRNs over 3 years: (1) identifying network directors; (2) deciding who to include; (3) obtaining recruitment lists; (4) sending out mailers; (5) hosting the first PBRN meeting; (6) gaining institutional review board (IRB) approval; (7) launching a simple study; (8) returning the findings; and (9) formalizing the PBRN and moving forward. Results: CTSAs will continue to seek ways to effectively engage community members in the clinical translation process. Conclusions: PBRNs are a promising laboratory for generating research questions directly from clinicians, conducting meaningful research, and then disseminating the findings to the larger community to accelerate positive change.
KW - Clinical translational science award
KW - Community health participatory research
KW - Community-based participatory research
KW - Health services research
KW - Practice-based research network
KW - Translational research
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84867846989&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84867846989&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1353/cpr.2012.0033
DO - 10.1353/cpr.2012.0033
M3 - Article
C2 - 22982850
AN - SCOPUS:84867846989
SN - 1557-0541
VL - 6
SP - 369
EP - 380
JO - Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action
JF - Progress in Community Health Partnerships: Research, Education, and Action
IS - 3
ER -