Correction to: Further Validation of the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM) Trial 1 Performance Validity Index: Examination of False Positives and Convergent Validity (Psychological Injury and Law, (2018), 11, 4, (325-335), 10.1007/s12207-018-9335-9)

Correction of mistake in the original version of this paper, BFurther Validation of the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM) Trial 1 Performance Validity Index: Examination of False Positives and Convergent Validity^, the sentence BAs indicated in Table 7, TOMMT1 ≤ 40 exhibited sensitivity of .86 and specificity of .85, though TOMMT1 ≤ 43 exhibited the best combination of sensitivity (.81) and specificity (.91) in our sample.^ in the Results section should read BAs indicated in Table 7, TOMM T1 ≤ 40 exhibited sensitivity of .85 and specificity of .86, though TOMM T1 ≤ 36 exhibited the best combination of sensitivity (.79) and specificity (.90) in our sample.^. In the Discussion section, the sentence BBased on standards in neuropsychology performance validity testing suggesting that sensitivity ≥.40 and specificity ≥.90 represent adequate classification accuracy (Boone, 2012), ROC curve analyses suggested TOMM T1 ≤42 had the best combination of sensitivity (.81) and specificity (.91) in our sample, while TOMM T1 ≤40 exhibited sensitivity of .86 and specificity of .85.^ should read BBased on standards in neuropsychology.