TY - JOUR
T1 - Correction
T2 - Maternal occupational exposure to chemicals and child cognitive function (Pediatric Research, (2022), 92, 4, (1153-1160), 10.1038/s41390-022-02089-6)
AU - Ish, Jennifer
AU - Symanski, Elaine
AU - Gimeno Ruiz de Porras, David
AU - Casas, Maribel
AU - Delclos, George L.
AU - Guxens, Mònica
AU - Ibarluzea, Jesús M.
AU - Iñiguez, Carmen
AU - Lertxundi, Aitana
AU - Rebagliato, Marisa
AU - Swartz, Michael D.
AU - Whitworth, Kristina W.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to the International Pediatric Research Foundation, Inc.
PY - 2023/1
Y1 - 2023/1
N2 - The original article unfortunately contained some mistakes. The exposure prevalence stated in the abstract was corrected from 39% to 24%. In the “Results” section, the following sentence was corrected to read: “Most women with possible or probable exposure to two or more EDC groups (n = 167) were employed as hairdressers (19.8%) or domestic cleaners (57.5%), with hairdressers accounting for a significant proportion of women exposed to phthalates (68.8%), organic solvents (18.1%), alkylphenolic compounds (21.7%), and miscellaneous chemicals (78.6%) and domestic cleaners making up the majority of women with exposure to organic solvents (52.7%) and alkylphenolic compounds (63.2%).” In addition, in Table 3, the sample sizes listed for each category of exposure to multiple chemical groups did not accurately reflect the number of participants included in the model and have been adjusted. Finally, in the “Discussion” section, the following sentence was corrected to read: “Notably, a substantial proportion of women with exposure to two or more EDC groups worked as hairdressers or barbers (19.8%) or domestic cleaners (57.5%), which is not surprising given the documented exposure to various chemicals among these occupational groups.” The original article has been corrected.
AB - The original article unfortunately contained some mistakes. The exposure prevalence stated in the abstract was corrected from 39% to 24%. In the “Results” section, the following sentence was corrected to read: “Most women with possible or probable exposure to two or more EDC groups (n = 167) were employed as hairdressers (19.8%) or domestic cleaners (57.5%), with hairdressers accounting for a significant proportion of women exposed to phthalates (68.8%), organic solvents (18.1%), alkylphenolic compounds (21.7%), and miscellaneous chemicals (78.6%) and domestic cleaners making up the majority of women with exposure to organic solvents (52.7%) and alkylphenolic compounds (63.2%).” In addition, in Table 3, the sample sizes listed for each category of exposure to multiple chemical groups did not accurately reflect the number of participants included in the model and have been adjusted. Finally, in the “Discussion” section, the following sentence was corrected to read: “Notably, a substantial proportion of women with exposure to two or more EDC groups worked as hairdressers or barbers (19.8%) or domestic cleaners (57.5%), which is not surprising given the documented exposure to various chemicals among these occupational groups.” The original article has been corrected.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85138573799&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85138573799&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s41390-022-02300-8
DO - 10.1038/s41390-022-02300-8
M3 - Comment/debate
C2 - 36138064
AN - SCOPUS:85138573799
SN - 0031-3998
VL - 93
SP - 278
EP - 279
JO - Pediatric Research
JF - Pediatric Research
IS - 1
ER -