Correcting for guessing increases validity in multiple-choice examinations in an oral and maxillofacial pathology course.

Thomas J. Prihoda, R. Neal Pinckard, C. Alex McMahan, Anne Cale Jones

Producción científica: Articlerevisión exhaustiva

21 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

A standard correction for random guessing on multiple-choice examinations was examined retrospectively in an oral and maxillofacial pathology course for second-year dental students. The correction was a weighting formula for points awarded for correct answers, incorrect answers, and unanswered questions such that the expected value of the increase in test score due to guessing was zero. We compared uncorrected and corrected scores on examinations using a multiple-choice format with scores on examinations composed of short-answer questions. The short-answer format eliminated or at least greatly reduced the potential for guessing the correct answer. Agreement of corrected multiple-choice scores with short-answer scores (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.78) was significantly (p=0.015) higher than agreement of uncorrected multiple-choice scores with short-answer scores (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.71). The higher agreement indicated increased validity for the corrected multiple-choice examination.

Idioma originalEnglish (US)
Páginas (desde-hasta)378-386
Número de páginas9
PublicaciónJournal of dental education
Volumen70
N.º4
EstadoPublished - abr 2006

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • General Dentistry

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Correcting for guessing increases validity in multiple-choice examinations in an oral and maxillofacial pathology course.'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto