Consolidative radiotherapy for limited metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: A phase 2 randomized clinical trial

Puneeth Iyengar, Zabi Wardak, David E. Gerber, Vasu Tumati, Chul Ahn, Randall S. Hughes, Jonathan E. Dowell, Naga Cheedella, Lucien Nedzi, Kenneth D. Westover, Suprabha Pulipparacharuvil, Hak Choy, Robert D. Timmerman

Resultado de la investigación: Articlerevisión exhaustiva

589 Citas (Scopus)


IMPORTANCE Patterns-of-failure studies suggest that in metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) sites of gross disease at presentation are the first to progress when treated with chemotherapy. This knowledge has led to increased adoption of local ablative radiation therapy in patients with stage IV NSCLC, though prospective randomized evidence is limited. OBJECTIVE To determine if intervening with noninvasive stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SAbR) prior to maintenance chemotherapy in patients with non-progressive limited metastatic NSCLC after induction therapy led to significant improvements in progression-free survival (PFS). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This is a single-institution randomized phase 2 study of maintenance chemotherapy alone vs SAbR followed by maintenance chemotherapy for patients with limited metastatic NSCLC (primary plus up to 5metastatic sites) whose tumors did not possess EGFR-targetable or ALK-targetable mutations but did achieve a partial response or stable disease after induction chemotherapy. INTERVENTIONS Maintenance chemotherapy or SAbR to all sites of gross disease (including SAbR or hypofractionated radiation to the primary) followed by maintenance chemotherapy. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary end pointwas PFS; secondary end points included toxic effects, local and distant tumor control, patterns of failure, and overall survival. RESULTS A total of 29 patients (9 women and 20 men) were enrolled; 14 patients (median [range] age, 63.5 [51.0-78.0] years) were allocated to the SAbR-plus-maintenance chemotherapy arm, and 15 patients (median [range] age, 70.0 [51.0-79.0] years) were allocated to the maintenance chemotherapy-alone arm. The trial was stopped to accrual early after an interim analysis found a significant improvement in PFS in the SAbR-plusmaintenance chemotherapy arm of 9.7 months vs 3.5 months in the maintenance chemotherapy-alone arm (P = .01). Toxic effects were similar in both arms. There were no in-field failures with fewer overall recurrences in the SAbR arm while those patients receiving maintenance therapy alone had progression at existing sites of disease and distantly. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Consolidative SAbR prior to maintenance chemotherapy appeared beneficial, nearly tripling PFS in patients with limited metastatic NSCLC compared with maintenance chemotherapy alone, with no difference in toxic effects. The irradiation prevented local failures in original disease, the most likely sites of first recurrence. Furthermore, PFS for patients with limited metastatic disease appeared similar to those patients with a greater metastatic burden, further arguing for the potential benefits of local therapy in limited metastatic settings.

Idioma originalEnglish (US)
Número de artículoe173501
PublicaciónJAMA Oncology
EstadoPublished - ene 2018
Publicado de forma externa

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research


Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Consolidative radiotherapy for limited metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer: A phase 2 randomized clinical trial'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto