Resumen
Introduction: Previous studies have demonstrated that common breast cancer susceptibility alleles are differentially associated with breast cancer risk for BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 mutation carriers. It is currently unknown how these alleles are associated with different breast cancer subtypes in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers defined by estrogen (ER) or progesterone receptor (PR) status of the tumour.Methods: We used genotype data on up to 11,421 BRCA1 and 7,080 BRCA2 carriers, of whom 4,310 had been affected with breast cancer and had information on either ER or PR status of the tumour, to assess the associations of 12 loci with breast cancer tumour characteristics. Associations were evaluated using a retrospective cohort approach.Results: The results suggested stronger associations with ER-positive breast cancer than ER-negative for 11 loci in both BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers. Among BRCA1 carriers, single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs2981582 (FGFR2) exhibited the biggest difference based on ER status (per-allele hazard ratio (HR) for ER-positive = 1.35, 95% CI: 1.17 to 1.56 vs HR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.85 to 0.98 for ER-negative, P-heterogeneity = 6.5 × 10-6). In contrast, SNP rs2046210 at 6q25.1 near ESR1 was primarily associated with ER-negative breast cancer risk for both BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers. In BRCA2 carriers, SNPs in FGFR2, TOX3, LSP1, SLC4A7/NEK10, 5p12, 2q35, and 1p11.2 were significantly associated with ER-positive but not ER-negative disease. Similar results were observed when differentiating breast cancer cases by PR status.Conclusions: The associations of the 12 SNPs with risk for BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers differ by ER-positive or ER-negative breast cancer status. The apparent differences in SNP associations between BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers, and non-carriers, may be explicable by differences in the prevalence of tumour subtypes. As more risk modifying variants are identified, incorporating these associations into breast cancer subtype-specific risk models may improve clinical management for mutation carriers.
Idioma original | English (US) |
---|---|
Número de artículo | R110 |
Publicación | Breast Cancer Research |
Volumen | 13 |
N.º | 6 |
DOI | |
Estado | Published - nov 2 2011 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Oncology
- Cancer Research
Acceder al documento
Otros archivos y enlaces
Huella
Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Common breast cancer susceptibility alleles are associated with tumour subtypes in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: results from the Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1/2'. En conjunto forman una huella única.Citar esto
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS
En: Breast Cancer Research, Vol. 13, N.º 6, R110, 02.11.2011.
Producción científica: Article › revisión exhaustiva
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Common breast cancer susceptibility alleles are associated with tumour subtypes in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers
T2 - results from the Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1/2
AU - Mulligan, Anna M.
AU - Couch, Fergus J.
AU - Barrowdale, Daniel
AU - Domchek, Susan M.
AU - Eccles, Diana
AU - Nevanlinna, Heli
AU - Ramus, Susan J.
AU - Robson, Mark
AU - Sherman, Mark
AU - Spurdle, Amanda B.
AU - Wappenschmidt, Barbara
AU - Lee, Andrew
AU - McGuffog, Lesley
AU - Healey, Sue
AU - Sinilnikova, Olga M.
AU - Janavicius, Ramunas
AU - Hansen, Thomas V.
AU - Nielsen, Finn C.
AU - Ejlertsen, Bent
AU - Osorio, Ana
AU - Muñoz-Repeto, Iván
AU - Durán, Mercedes
AU - Godino, Javier
AU - Pertesi, Maroulio
AU - Benítez, Javier
AU - Peterlongo, Paolo
AU - Manoukian, Siranoush
AU - Peissel, Bernard
AU - Zaffaroni, Daniela
AU - Cattaneo, Elisa
AU - Bonanni, Bernardo
AU - Viel, Alessandra
AU - Pasini, Barbara
AU - Papi, Laura
AU - Ottini, Laura
AU - Savarese, Antonella
AU - Bernard, Loris
AU - Radice, Paolo
AU - Hamann, Ute
AU - Verheus, Martijn
AU - Meijers-Heijboer, Hanne E.J.
AU - Wijnen, Juul
AU - Gómez García, Encarna B.
AU - Nelen, Marcel R.
AU - Kets, C. Marleen
AU - Seynaeve, Caroline
AU - Tilanus-Linthorst, Madeleine M.A.
AU - van der Luijt, Rob B.
AU - Os, Theo V.
AU - Rookus, Matti
AU - Frost, Debra
AU - Jones, J. Louise
AU - Evans, D. Gareth
AU - Lalloo, Fiona
AU - Eeles, Ros
AU - Izatt, Louise
AU - Adlard, Julian
AU - Davidson, Rosemarie
AU - Cook, Jackie
AU - Donaldson, Alan
AU - Dorkins, Huw
AU - Gregory, Helen
AU - Eason, Jacqueline
AU - Houghton, Catherine
AU - Barwell, Julian
AU - Side, Lucy E.
AU - McCann, Emma
AU - Murray, Alex
AU - Peock, Susan
AU - Godwin, Andrew K.
AU - Schmutzler, Rita K.
AU - Rhiem, Kerstin
AU - Engel, Christoph
AU - Meindl, Alfons
AU - Ruehl, Ina
AU - Arnold, Norbert
AU - Niederacher, Dieter
AU - Sutter, Christian
AU - Deissler, Helmut
AU - Gadzicki, Dorothea
AU - Kast, Karin
AU - Preisler-Adams, Sabine
AU - Varon-Mateeva, Raymonda
AU - Schoenbuchner, Ines
AU - Fiebig, Britta
AU - Heinritz, Wolfram
AU - Schäfer, Dieter
AU - Gevensleben, Heidrun
AU - Caux-Moncoutier, Virginie
AU - Fassy-Colcombet, Marion
AU - Cornelis, François
AU - Mazoyer, Sylvie
AU - Léoné, Mélanie
AU - Boutry-Kryza, Nadia
AU - Hardouin, Agnès
AU - Berthet, Pascaline
AU - Muller, Danièle
AU - Fricker, Jean Pierre
AU - Mortemousque, Isabelle
AU - Pujol, Pascal
AU - Coupier, Isabelle
AU - Lebrun, Marine
AU - Kientz, Caroline
AU - Longy, Michel
AU - Sevenet, Nicolas
AU - Stoppa-Lyonnet, Dominique
AU - Isaacs, Claudine
AU - Caldes, Trinidad
AU - de la Hoya, Miguel
AU - Heikkinen, Tuomas
AU - Aittomäki, Kristiina
AU - Blanco, Ignacio
AU - Lazaro, Conxi
AU - Barkardottir, Rosa B.
AU - Soucy, Penny
AU - Dumont, Martine
AU - Simard, Jacques
AU - Montagna, Marco
AU - Tognazzo, Silvia
AU - D'Andrea, Emma
AU - Fox, Stephen
AU - Yan, Max
AU - Rebbeck, Tim
AU - Olopade, Olufunmilayo I.
AU - Weitzel, Jeffrey N.
AU - Lynch, Henry T.
AU - Ganz, Patricia A.
AU - Tomlinson, Gail E.
AU - Wang, Xianshu
AU - Fredericksen, Zachary
AU - Pankratz, Vernon S.
AU - Lindor, Noralane M.
AU - Szabo, Csilla
AU - Offit, Kenneth
AU - Sakr, Rita
AU - Gaudet, Mia
AU - Bhatia, Jasmine
AU - Kauff, Noah
AU - Singer, Christian F.
AU - Tea, Muy Kheng
AU - gschwantler-kaulich, Daphne
AU - Fink-Retter, Anneliese
AU - Mai, Phuong L.
AU - Greene, Mark H.
AU - Imyanitov, Evgeny
AU - O'Malley, Frances P.
AU - Ozcelik, Hilmi
AU - Glendon, Gordon
AU - Toland, Amanda E.
AU - Gerdes, Anne Marie
AU - Thomassen, Mads
AU - Kruse, Torben A.
AU - Jensen, Uffe B.
AU - Skytte, Anne Bine
AU - Caligo, Maria A.
AU - Soller, Maria
AU - Henriksson, Karin
AU - Wachenfeldt, von Anna
AU - Arver, Brita
AU - Stenmark-Askmalm, Marie
AU - Karlsson, Per
AU - Ding, Yuan C.
AU - Neuhausen, Susan L.
AU - Beattie, Mary
AU - Pharoah, Paul D.P.
AU - Moysich, Kirsten B.
AU - Nathanson, Katherine L.
AU - Karlan, Beth Y.
AU - Gross, Jenny
AU - John, Esther M.
AU - Daly, Mary B.
AU - Buys, Saundra M.
AU - Southey, Melissa C.
AU - Hopper, John L.
AU - Terry, Mary B.
AU - Chung, Wendy
AU - Miron, Alexander F.
AU - Goldgar, David
AU - Chenevix-Trench, Georgia
AU - Easton, Douglas F.
AU - Andrulis, Irene L.
AU - Antoniou, Antonis C.
N1 - Funding Information: ILUH The ILUH group was supported by the Icelandic Association “Walking for Breast Cancer Research” and by the Landspitali University Hospital Research Fund. Istituto Oncologico Veneto Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Study (IOVHBOCS) This study was supported by “Ministero della Salute” ("Progetto Tumouri Femminili and grant numbers RFPS 2006-5-341353, ACC2/R6.9”) Kathleen Cuningham Consortium for Research into Familial Breast Cancer (kConFab) We wish to thank Heather Thorne, Eveline Niedermayr, all the kConFab research nurses and staff, the heads and staff of the Family Cancer Clinics, and the Clinical Follow Up Study (funded 2001-2009 by NHMRC and currently by the National Breast Cancer Foundation and Cancer Australia #628333) for their contributions to this resource, and the many families who contribute to kConFab. kConFab is supported by grants from the National Breast Cancer Foundation, the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) and by the Queensland Cancer Fund, the Cancer Councils of New South Wales, Victoria, Tasmania and South Australia, and the Cancer Foundation of Western Australia. ABS and GCT are NHMRC Fellows. Mayo Clinic Study The MAYO study was supported by NIH grants CA116167, CA128978, a Specialized Program of Research Excellence (SPORE) in Breast Cancer (CA116201), and awards from the Komen Foundation for the Cure and the Breast Cancer Research Foundation. Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) The study is supported by grant from the Breast Cancer Research Foundation, Starr Cancer Consortium, Norman and Carol Stone Genetic Research Fund, The Robert and Kate Niehaus Clinical Genetics Initiative at MSKCC National Cancer Institute study (NCI) The research of Drs. PL Mai and MH Greene was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the US National Cancer Institute, and by support services contracts NO2-CP-11019-50 and N02-CP-65504 with Westat, Inc., Rockville, MD. N.N. Petrov Institute of Oncology This work has been supported by the Russian Federation for Basic Research (grants 10-04-92601, 10-04-92110, 11-04-00227), the Federal Agency for Science and Innovations (contract 02.740.11.0780), the Commission of the European Communities (grant PITN-GA-2009-238132) and through a Royal Society International Joint grant (JP090615). Ontario Cancer Genetics Network (OCGN) We wish to thank Mona Gill, Lucine Collins, Nalan Gokgoz, Teresa Selander, Nayana Weerasooriya and members of the Ontario Cancer Genetics Network for their contributions to the study. The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center (OSU-CCG) This work was supported by the Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center. We thank Kevin Sweet and Leigha Senter for accrual of study participants and data management. The Human Genetics Sample bank prepared DNA samples and the OSU Nucleic Acids Shared Resource assisted with genotyping. Swedish BRCA1 and BRCA2 study (SWE-BRCA) SWE-BRCA collaborators: Margareta Nordling, Annika Bergman and Zakaria Einbeigi, Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital; Sigrun Liedgren, Linköping University Hospital; Åke Borg, Niklas Loman, Håkan Olsson, Ulf Kristoffersson, Helena Jernström, Katja Harbst, Lund University Hospital; Annika Lindblom, Annelie Liljegren, Gisela Barbany-Bustinza and Johanna Rantala, Stockholm, Karolinska University Hospital; Beatrice Melin, Henrik Grönberg, Eva-Lena Stattin and Monica Emanuelsson, Umeå University Hospital; Hans Ehrencrona, Richard Rosenquist and Niklas Dahl, Uppsala University Hospital. University California San Francisco (UCSF) The study received funding from the NIH, NCI Bay Area Breast Cancer SPORE (P50 CA 058207) and the Avon Foundation. We acknowledge support from the UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center UK and Gilda Radner Familial Ovarian Cancer Registries (UKGRFOCR) UKFOCR was supported by a project grant from CRUK to Paul Pharoah. We thank Simon Gayther, Carole Pye, Patricia Harrington and Eva Wozniak for their contributions towards the UKFOCR. We’d like to acknowledge the Roswell Park Alliance Foundation for their continued support of the Gilda Radner Ovarian Family Cancer Registry. GRFOCR would like to acknowledge Lara Sucheston (Department of Cancer Prevention and Control) and Kunle Odunsi (Departments Gynecologic Oncology and Immunology). University of Pennsylvania (UPENN) Work is supported by grants from the Breast Cancer Research Foundation (to KLN), MacDonald Family Foundation (SMD) and Komen Foundation (SMD)
PY - 2011/11/2
Y1 - 2011/11/2
N2 - Introduction: Previous studies have demonstrated that common breast cancer susceptibility alleles are differentially associated with breast cancer risk for BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 mutation carriers. It is currently unknown how these alleles are associated with different breast cancer subtypes in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers defined by estrogen (ER) or progesterone receptor (PR) status of the tumour.Methods: We used genotype data on up to 11,421 BRCA1 and 7,080 BRCA2 carriers, of whom 4,310 had been affected with breast cancer and had information on either ER or PR status of the tumour, to assess the associations of 12 loci with breast cancer tumour characteristics. Associations were evaluated using a retrospective cohort approach.Results: The results suggested stronger associations with ER-positive breast cancer than ER-negative for 11 loci in both BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers. Among BRCA1 carriers, single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs2981582 (FGFR2) exhibited the biggest difference based on ER status (per-allele hazard ratio (HR) for ER-positive = 1.35, 95% CI: 1.17 to 1.56 vs HR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.85 to 0.98 for ER-negative, P-heterogeneity = 6.5 × 10-6). In contrast, SNP rs2046210 at 6q25.1 near ESR1 was primarily associated with ER-negative breast cancer risk for both BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers. In BRCA2 carriers, SNPs in FGFR2, TOX3, LSP1, SLC4A7/NEK10, 5p12, 2q35, and 1p11.2 were significantly associated with ER-positive but not ER-negative disease. Similar results were observed when differentiating breast cancer cases by PR status.Conclusions: The associations of the 12 SNPs with risk for BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers differ by ER-positive or ER-negative breast cancer status. The apparent differences in SNP associations between BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers, and non-carriers, may be explicable by differences in the prevalence of tumour subtypes. As more risk modifying variants are identified, incorporating these associations into breast cancer subtype-specific risk models may improve clinical management for mutation carriers.
AB - Introduction: Previous studies have demonstrated that common breast cancer susceptibility alleles are differentially associated with breast cancer risk for BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 mutation carriers. It is currently unknown how these alleles are associated with different breast cancer subtypes in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers defined by estrogen (ER) or progesterone receptor (PR) status of the tumour.Methods: We used genotype data on up to 11,421 BRCA1 and 7,080 BRCA2 carriers, of whom 4,310 had been affected with breast cancer and had information on either ER or PR status of the tumour, to assess the associations of 12 loci with breast cancer tumour characteristics. Associations were evaluated using a retrospective cohort approach.Results: The results suggested stronger associations with ER-positive breast cancer than ER-negative for 11 loci in both BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers. Among BRCA1 carriers, single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) rs2981582 (FGFR2) exhibited the biggest difference based on ER status (per-allele hazard ratio (HR) for ER-positive = 1.35, 95% CI: 1.17 to 1.56 vs HR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.85 to 0.98 for ER-negative, P-heterogeneity = 6.5 × 10-6). In contrast, SNP rs2046210 at 6q25.1 near ESR1 was primarily associated with ER-negative breast cancer risk for both BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers. In BRCA2 carriers, SNPs in FGFR2, TOX3, LSP1, SLC4A7/NEK10, 5p12, 2q35, and 1p11.2 were significantly associated with ER-positive but not ER-negative disease. Similar results were observed when differentiating breast cancer cases by PR status.Conclusions: The associations of the 12 SNPs with risk for BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers differ by ER-positive or ER-negative breast cancer status. The apparent differences in SNP associations between BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers, and non-carriers, may be explicable by differences in the prevalence of tumour subtypes. As more risk modifying variants are identified, incorporating these associations into breast cancer subtype-specific risk models may improve clinical management for mutation carriers.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=80055117035&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=80055117035&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1186/bcr3052
DO - 10.1186/bcr3052
M3 - Article
C2 - 22053997
AN - SCOPUS:80055117035
SN - 1465-5411
VL - 13
JO - Breast Cancer Research
JF - Breast Cancer Research
IS - 6
M1 - R110
ER -