TY - JOUR
T1 - Clinical and molecular epidemiology of vancomycin-resistant enterococcus faecium during its emergence in a city in southern texas
AU - Moreno, Francisco
AU - Grota, Patti
AU - Crisp, Cindy
AU - Magnon, Karen
AU - Melcher, Gregory P.
AU - Jorgensen, James H.
AU - Patterson, Jan Evans
PY - 1995/11
Y1 - 1995/11
N2 - During a 19-month period from April 1993 to October 1994, 41 isolates of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREF) were detectedin seven different hospitals in a city in southern Texas. A case-control study to determine the risk factors for acquisition was done in the hospital in which the majority of isolates were detected. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) of whole-cell DNA was used to determine strain identity. Thirty-five (85%) of the 41 VREF isolates were of the vanB phenotype. Of these, 32 (91%)of 35 were the same strain by PFGE typing. The same vanB strain was documented in five different hospitals in the city. In contrast, 4 (67%) of 6 of the vanA phenotype VREF isolates were distinct strains by PFGE typing.Significant risk factors for colonization or infection with VREF were prior exposure to antibiotics (P =.04), the previous use of third-generation cephalosporins (P =.03), and the previous use of parenteral vancomycin (P =.002). Infection-control and antibiotic-utilization measures were implemented to control cross-transmission andselection of VREF isolates. During the emergenceof VREF in our city, clonal dissemination of a single strain of vanB VREF among six hospitals was documented. Limited cross-transmission of vanAphenotype VREF isolates occurred, but most vanA VREF isolates were distinct strains selected in individual hospital environments.
AB - During a 19-month period from April 1993 to October 1994, 41 isolates of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREF) were detectedin seven different hospitals in a city in southern Texas. A case-control study to determine the risk factors for acquisition was done in the hospital in which the majority of isolates were detected. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) of whole-cell DNA was used to determine strain identity. Thirty-five (85%) of the 41 VREF isolates were of the vanB phenotype. Of these, 32 (91%)of 35 were the same strain by PFGE typing. The same vanB strain was documented in five different hospitals in the city. In contrast, 4 (67%) of 6 of the vanA phenotype VREF isolates were distinct strains by PFGE typing.Significant risk factors for colonization or infection with VREF were prior exposure to antibiotics (P =.04), the previous use of third-generation cephalosporins (P =.03), and the previous use of parenteral vancomycin (P =.002). Infection-control and antibiotic-utilization measures were implemented to control cross-transmission andselection of VREF isolates. During the emergenceof VREF in our city, clonal dissemination of a single strain of vanB VREF among six hospitals was documented. Limited cross-transmission of vanAphenotype VREF isolates occurred, but most vanA VREF isolates were distinct strains selected in individual hospital environments.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0028800316&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0028800316&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/clinids/21.5.1234
DO - 10.1093/clinids/21.5.1234
M3 - Article
C2 - 8589148
AN - SCOPUS:0028800316
SN - 1058-4838
VL - 21
SP - 1234
EP - 1237
JO - Clinical Infectious Diseases
JF - Clinical Infectious Diseases
IS - 5
ER -