TY - JOUR
T1 - Classification of Cough as a Symptom in Adults and Management Algorithms
T2 - CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report
AU - CHEST Expert Cough Panel
AU - Irwin, Richard S.
AU - French, Cynthia L.
AU - Chang, Anne B.
AU - Altman, Kenneth W.
AU - Adams, Todd M.
AU - Altman, Kenneth W.
AU - Azoulay, Elie
AU - Barker, Alan F.
AU - Birring, Surinder S.
AU - Blackhall, Fiona
AU - Bolser, Donald C.
AU - Boulet, Louis Philippe
AU - Brightling, Christopher
AU - Callahan-Lyon, Priscilla
AU - Cowley, Terrie
AU - Ebihara, Satoru
AU - El Solh, Ali A.
AU - Escalante, Patricio
AU - Field, Stephen K.
AU - Fisher, Dina
AU - French, Cynthia T.
AU - Gibson, Peter
AU - Gold, Philip
AU - Harding, Susan M.
AU - Harnden, Anthony
AU - Hill, Adam T.
AU - Irwin, Richard S.
AU - Kavanagh, Joanne
AU - Keogh, Karina A.
AU - Lai, Kefang
AU - Lane, Andrew P.
AU - Lim, Kaiser
AU - Madison, J. Mark
AU - Malesker, Mark A.
AU - Mazzone, Stuart
AU - Molassoitis, Alex
AU - Murad, M. Hassan
AU - Narasimhan, Mangala
AU - Nguyen, Huong Q.
AU - Newcombe, Peter
AU - Oppenheimer, John
AU - Restrepo, Marcos I.
AU - Rosen, Mark
AU - Rubin, Bruce
AU - Ryu, Jay H.
AU - Tarlo, Susan M.
AU - Turmel, Julie
AU - Vertigan, Anne E.
AU - Wang, Gang
AU - Weinberger, Miles
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 American College of Chest Physicians
PY - 2018/1
Y1 - 2018/1
N2 - Background We performed systematic reviews using the population, intervention, comparison, outcome (PICO) format to answer the following key clinical question: Are the CHEST 2006 classifications of acute, subacute and chronic cough and associated management algorithms in adults that were based on durations of cough useful? Methods We used the CHEST Expert Cough Panel's protocol for the systematic reviews and the American College of Chest Physicians (CHEST) methodological guidelines and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation framework. Data from the systematic reviews in conjunction with patient values and preferences and the clinical context were used to form recommendations or suggestions. Delphi methodology was used to obtain the final grading. Results With respect to acute cough (< 3 weeks), only three studies met our criteria for quality assessment, and all had a high risk of bias. As predicted by the 2006 CHEST Cough Guidelines, the most common causes were respiratory infections, most likely of viral cause, followed by exacerbations of underlying diseases such as asthma and COPD and pneumonia. The subjects resided on three continents: North America, Europe, and Asia. With respect to subacute cough (duration, 3-8 weeks), only two studies met our criteria for quality assessment, and both had a high risk of bias. As predicted by the 2006 guidelines, the most common causes were postinfectious cough and exacerbation of underlying diseases such as asthma, COPD, and upper airway cough syndrome (UACS). The subjects resided in countries in Asia. With respect to chronic cough (> 8 weeks), 11 studies met our criteria for quality assessment, and all had a high risk of bias. As predicted by the 2006 guidelines, the most common causes were UACS from rhinosinus conditions, asthma, gastroesophageal reflux disease, nonasthmatic eosinophilic bronchitis, combinations of these four conditions, and, less commonly, a variety of miscellaneous conditions and atopic cough in Asian countries. The subjects resided on four continents: North America, South America, Europe, and Asia. Conclusions Although the quality of evidence was low, the published literature since 2006 suggests that CHEST's 2006 Cough Guidelines and management algorithms for acute, subacute, and chronic cough in adults appeared useful in diagnosing and treating patients with cough around the globe. These same algorithms have been updated to reflect the advances in cough management as of 2017.
AB - Background We performed systematic reviews using the population, intervention, comparison, outcome (PICO) format to answer the following key clinical question: Are the CHEST 2006 classifications of acute, subacute and chronic cough and associated management algorithms in adults that were based on durations of cough useful? Methods We used the CHEST Expert Cough Panel's protocol for the systematic reviews and the American College of Chest Physicians (CHEST) methodological guidelines and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation framework. Data from the systematic reviews in conjunction with patient values and preferences and the clinical context were used to form recommendations or suggestions. Delphi methodology was used to obtain the final grading. Results With respect to acute cough (< 3 weeks), only three studies met our criteria for quality assessment, and all had a high risk of bias. As predicted by the 2006 CHEST Cough Guidelines, the most common causes were respiratory infections, most likely of viral cause, followed by exacerbations of underlying diseases such as asthma and COPD and pneumonia. The subjects resided on three continents: North America, Europe, and Asia. With respect to subacute cough (duration, 3-8 weeks), only two studies met our criteria for quality assessment, and both had a high risk of bias. As predicted by the 2006 guidelines, the most common causes were postinfectious cough and exacerbation of underlying diseases such as asthma, COPD, and upper airway cough syndrome (UACS). The subjects resided in countries in Asia. With respect to chronic cough (> 8 weeks), 11 studies met our criteria for quality assessment, and all had a high risk of bias. As predicted by the 2006 guidelines, the most common causes were UACS from rhinosinus conditions, asthma, gastroesophageal reflux disease, nonasthmatic eosinophilic bronchitis, combinations of these four conditions, and, less commonly, a variety of miscellaneous conditions and atopic cough in Asian countries. The subjects resided on four continents: North America, South America, Europe, and Asia. Conclusions Although the quality of evidence was low, the published literature since 2006 suggests that CHEST's 2006 Cough Guidelines and management algorithms for acute, subacute, and chronic cough in adults appeared useful in diagnosing and treating patients with cough around the globe. These same algorithms have been updated to reflect the advances in cough management as of 2017.
KW - cough
KW - evidence-based medicine
KW - guidelines
KW - management algorithms for acute, subacute, and chronic cough in adults
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85040196465&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85040196465&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.chest.2017.10.016
DO - 10.1016/j.chest.2017.10.016
M3 - Article
C2 - 29080708
AN - SCOPUS:85040196465
SN - 0012-3692
VL - 153
SP - 196
EP - 209
JO - Chest
JF - Chest
IS - 1
ER -