Chronic total occlusions—Is true lumen wire passage preferred to subintimal dissection re-entry?

Marc D. Feldman; Joel Michalek

doi:10.1002/ccd.28312

Chronic total occlusions—Is true lumen wire passage preferred to subintimal dissection re-entry?

Producción científica: Editorial › revisión exhaustiva

Resumen

True lumen crossing is superior to subintimal crossing. Subintimal versus true lumen crossing may only be apparent if IVUS is performed. Newer techniques for true lumen crossing need to be developed.

Idioma original	English (US)
Páginas (desde-hasta)	1057-1058
Número de páginas	2
Publicación	Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Volumen	93
N.º	6
DOI	https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.28312
Estado	Published - may 1 2019

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Acceder al documento

10.1002/ccd.28312

Otros archivos y enlaces

Citar esto

@article{9a11680e11694d6ba0c605fb8a4a2781,

title = "Chronic total occlusions—Is true lumen wire passage preferred to subintimal dissection re-entry?",

abstract = "True lumen crossing is superior to subintimal crossing. Subintimal versus true lumen crossing may only be apparent if IVUS is performed. Newer techniques for true lumen crossing need to be developed.",

author = "Feldman, {Marc D.} and Joel Michalek",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.",

year = "2019",

month = may,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1002/ccd.28312",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "93",

pages = "1057--1058",

journal = "Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions",

issn = "1522-1946",