TY - JOUR
T1 - Cefixime allows greater dose escalation of oral irinotecan
T2 - A phase I study in pediatric patients with refractory solid tumors
AU - Furman, Wayne L.
AU - Crews, Kristine R.
AU - Billups, Catherine
AU - Wu, Jianrong
AU - Gajjar, Amar J.
AU - Daw, Najat C.
AU - Patrick, Christian C.
AU - Rodriguez-Galindo, Carlos
AU - Stewart, Clinton F.
AU - Dome, Jeffrey S.
AU - Panetta, John C.
AU - Houghton, Peter J.
AU - Santana, Victor M.
PY - 2006/2/1
Y1 - 2006/2/1
N2 - Purpose: Irinotecan is active against a variety of malignancies; however, severe diarrhea limits its usefulness. In our phase I study, the intravenous formulation of irinotecan was administered orally daily for 5 days for 2 consecutive weeks (repeated every 21 days) to children with refractory solid tumors. Our objectives were to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicity, and pharmacokinetics of oral irinotecan and to evaluate whether coadministration of cefixime (8 mg/kg/d beginning 5 days before irinotecan and continuing throughout the course) ameliorates irinotecan-induced diarrhea. Patients and Methods: In separate cohorts, irinotecan doses were escalated from 15 to 45 mg/m2/d without cefixime and then from 45 to 60 and 75 mg/m2/d with cefixime. Results: Without cefixime, diarrhea was dose limiting at irinotecan 45 mg/m2/d. Myelotoxicity was not significant at any dose. The MTD was 40 mg/m2/d without cefixime but 60 mg/m2/d with cefixime. Systemic exposure to SN-38 at the MTD was significantly higher with cefixime than without cefixime (mean SN-38 area under the curve: 19.5 ngxh/mL; standard deviation [SD], 6.8 ng x h/mL v 10.4 ng x h/mL; SD, 4.3 ng x h/mL, respectively; P= .030). Conclusion: Cefixime administered with oral irinotecan is well tolerated in children and allows greater dose escalation of irinotecan. Because diarrhea is a major adverse effect of both intravenous and oral irinotecan, further evaluation of the use of cefixime to ameliorate this adverse effect is warranted.
AB - Purpose: Irinotecan is active against a variety of malignancies; however, severe diarrhea limits its usefulness. In our phase I study, the intravenous formulation of irinotecan was administered orally daily for 5 days for 2 consecutive weeks (repeated every 21 days) to children with refractory solid tumors. Our objectives were to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicity, and pharmacokinetics of oral irinotecan and to evaluate whether coadministration of cefixime (8 mg/kg/d beginning 5 days before irinotecan and continuing throughout the course) ameliorates irinotecan-induced diarrhea. Patients and Methods: In separate cohorts, irinotecan doses were escalated from 15 to 45 mg/m2/d without cefixime and then from 45 to 60 and 75 mg/m2/d with cefixime. Results: Without cefixime, diarrhea was dose limiting at irinotecan 45 mg/m2/d. Myelotoxicity was not significant at any dose. The MTD was 40 mg/m2/d without cefixime but 60 mg/m2/d with cefixime. Systemic exposure to SN-38 at the MTD was significantly higher with cefixime than without cefixime (mean SN-38 area under the curve: 19.5 ngxh/mL; standard deviation [SD], 6.8 ng x h/mL v 10.4 ng x h/mL; SD, 4.3 ng x h/mL, respectively; P= .030). Conclusion: Cefixime administered with oral irinotecan is well tolerated in children and allows greater dose escalation of irinotecan. Because diarrhea is a major adverse effect of both intravenous and oral irinotecan, further evaluation of the use of cefixime to ameliorate this adverse effect is warranted.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33644841966&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33644841966&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.2847
DO - 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.2847
M3 - Article
C2 - 16446328
AN - SCOPUS:33644841966
SN - 0732-183X
VL - 24
SP - 563
EP - 570
JO - Journal of Clinical Oncology
JF - Journal of Clinical Oncology
IS - 4
ER -