TY - JOUR
T1 - Caries preventing efficacy of new Isomalt-containing mouthrinse formulations
T2 - a microbial study
AU - Amaechi, Bennett T.
AU - AbdulAzees, Parveez Ahamed
AU - Mohseni, Sahar
AU - Luong, Minh N.
AU - Lin, Chun Yen
AU - Restrepo-Ceron, Maria Camila
AU - Kataoka, Yuko
AU - Omosebi, Temitope O.
AU - Kanthaiah, Kannan
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2024.
PY - 2024/12
Y1 - 2024/12
N2 - Objectives: The effectiveness of an Isomalt-containing mouthrinse to prevent caries development was investigated. Methods: Human enamel blocks were randomly assigned to five groups (n = 30/group): De-ionized distilled water (DDW), and mouthrinse containing either (IFC) 1% Isomalt, 225 ppm fluoride, and 0.05% cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC), (IF) 1% Isomalt and 225ppm fluoride, (FC) 225 ppm fluoride and 0.05% CPC or (F) 225 ppm fluoride. During 7-day demineralization in a Microbial Caries Model, mouthrinses were applied once daily for 1 min. Demineralization was assessed using Surface Microhardness testing for percentage change in SMH (%ΔSMH) and Transverse Microradiography for mineral loss (ΔZ). Data analysis (α = 0.05) used paired t-test (Intra-group comparison using SMH) and ANOVA/Tukey’s for inter-group comparisons (%ΔSMH and ΔZ). Results: With SMH, relative to sound enamel baseline, demineralization was significant (P < 0.001) in all groups, except in IFC. Intergroup comparison with %ΔSMH showed significantly (p < 0.001) greater demineralization in DDW compared to other groups, and in IF, FC, and F compared to IFC (P < 0.001). With ΔZ, relative to DDW, all groups significantly (p < 0.0001) inhibited demineralization at varying percentages. Conclusions: Mouthrinse containing Isomalt, fluoride, and CPC inhibited demineralization amidst cariogenic biofilm; thus, highlighting its potential as a more effective caries control tool than mouthrinse with only fluoride.
AB - Objectives: The effectiveness of an Isomalt-containing mouthrinse to prevent caries development was investigated. Methods: Human enamel blocks were randomly assigned to five groups (n = 30/group): De-ionized distilled water (DDW), and mouthrinse containing either (IFC) 1% Isomalt, 225 ppm fluoride, and 0.05% cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC), (IF) 1% Isomalt and 225ppm fluoride, (FC) 225 ppm fluoride and 0.05% CPC or (F) 225 ppm fluoride. During 7-day demineralization in a Microbial Caries Model, mouthrinses were applied once daily for 1 min. Demineralization was assessed using Surface Microhardness testing for percentage change in SMH (%ΔSMH) and Transverse Microradiography for mineral loss (ΔZ). Data analysis (α = 0.05) used paired t-test (Intra-group comparison using SMH) and ANOVA/Tukey’s for inter-group comparisons (%ΔSMH and ΔZ). Results: With SMH, relative to sound enamel baseline, demineralization was significant (P < 0.001) in all groups, except in IFC. Intergroup comparison with %ΔSMH showed significantly (p < 0.001) greater demineralization in DDW compared to other groups, and in IF, FC, and F compared to IFC (P < 0.001). With ΔZ, relative to DDW, all groups significantly (p < 0.0001) inhibited demineralization at varying percentages. Conclusions: Mouthrinse containing Isomalt, fluoride, and CPC inhibited demineralization amidst cariogenic biofilm; thus, highlighting its potential as a more effective caries control tool than mouthrinse with only fluoride.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85196172124&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85196172124&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s41405-024-00241-4
DO - 10.1038/s41405-024-00241-4
M3 - Article
C2 - 38890317
AN - SCOPUS:85196172124
SN - 2056-807X
VL - 10
JO - BDJ Open
JF - BDJ Open
IS - 1
M1 - 51
ER -