Resumen
Objective: To evaluate whether the Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ), a commonly used measure of functional status in neurodegenerative disease research, performs equivalently across demographically diverse subgroups of participants. Method: The FAQs from 30,613 National Alzheimer's Coordinating Center participants were evaluated with a hybrid graded response model-logistic ordinal regression approach to determine the presence of differential item functioning (DIF) within five demographic groups: education, ethnicity, race, language, and sex. Results: Measurable DIF was observed for FAQ items in all groups; however, measures of effect size, latent trait distributions, and item characteristic curves suggested that the impact was minimal for research and practice. Conclusions: The FAQ is able to provide minimally biased assessments of daily functioning across diverse participants, suggesting potential value for offsetting disparities in diagnosis and treatment.
| Idioma original | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Páginas (desde-hasta) | 276-282 |
| Número de páginas | 7 |
| Publicación | Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology |
| Volumen | 38 |
| N.º | 2 |
| DOI | |
| Estado | Published - mar 1 2023 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology
- Clinical Psychology
- Psychiatry and Mental health
Huella
Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'Brief Report: An Evaluation of Item Bias on the Functional Activities Questionnaire'. En conjunto forman una huella única.Citar esto
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS