TY - JOUR
T1 - Branded versus generic clozapine
T2 - Bioavailability comparison and interchangeability issues
AU - Lam, F. Y.W.
AU - Ereshefsky, L.
AU - Toney, G. B.
AU - Gonzales, C.
PY - 2001
Y1 - 2001
N2 - Clozapine has been the treatment of choice for patients with refractory schizophrenia. Generic clozapine has recently become available, because of a waiver of the usual criteria for establishing bioequivalence. However, there are biopharmaceutical, bioavailability, and clinical concerns related to the generic formulation raised by both clinicians and academic researchers. We conducted a prospective, randomized, crossover study to evaluate steady-state pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and tolerability of generic clozapine (Zenith Goldline Pharmaceuticals) versus Clozaril (Novartis Pharmaceuticals) in schizophrenic patients. A preliminary report of the pertinent bioavailability results is presented here. Despite comparable mean plasma concentration-time curves, significant differences were found in the primary pharmacokinetic parameters of the 2 formulations in almost 40% of patients. Such intraindividual differences raise the issue of average bioequivalence versus individual bioequivalence and the implication for interchangeability of different clozapine formulations. The decision to switch a patient from branded to generic clozapine should be made on an individual basis with special emphasis on clinical outcome, and patients should be monitored closely during the transition.
AB - Clozapine has been the treatment of choice for patients with refractory schizophrenia. Generic clozapine has recently become available, because of a waiver of the usual criteria for establishing bioequivalence. However, there are biopharmaceutical, bioavailability, and clinical concerns related to the generic formulation raised by both clinicians and academic researchers. We conducted a prospective, randomized, crossover study to evaluate steady-state pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and tolerability of generic clozapine (Zenith Goldline Pharmaceuticals) versus Clozaril (Novartis Pharmaceuticals) in schizophrenic patients. A preliminary report of the pertinent bioavailability results is presented here. Despite comparable mean plasma concentration-time curves, significant differences were found in the primary pharmacokinetic parameters of the 2 formulations in almost 40% of patients. Such intraindividual differences raise the issue of average bioequivalence versus individual bioequivalence and the implication for interchangeability of different clozapine formulations. The decision to switch a patient from branded to generic clozapine should be made on an individual basis with special emphasis on clinical outcome, and patients should be monitored closely during the transition.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035071578&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0035071578&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Article
C2 - 11305844
AN - SCOPUS:0035071578
SN - 0160-6689
VL - 62
SP - 18
EP - 22
JO - Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
JF - Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
IS - SUPPL. 5
ER -