TY - JOUR
T1 - Antimicrobial susceptibility testing
T2 - A review of general principles and contemporary practices
AU - Jorgensen, James H.
AU - Ferraro, Mary Jane
N1 - Funding Information:
Potential conflicts of interest. J.H.J. and M.J.F. disclose their membership on microbiology advisory committees for BD Diagnostics and bioMérieux. J.H.J. has advised Accelr8 Technology and has received research support from BD Diagnostics, bioMérieux, Merck, Pfizer, and Siemens Healthcare.
PY - 2009/12
Y1 - 2009/12
N2 - An important task of the clinical microbiology laboratory is the performance of antimicrobial susceptibility testing of significant bacterial isolates. The goals of testing are to detect possible drug resistance in common pathogens and to assure susceptibility to drugs of choice for particular infections. The most widely used testing methods include broth microdilution or rapid automated instrument methods that use commercially marketed materials and devices. Manual methods that provide flexibility and possible cost savings include the disk diffusion and gradient diffusion methods. Each method has strengths and weaknesses, including organisms that may be accurately tested by the method. Some methods provide quantitative results (eg, minimum inhibitory concentration), and all provide qualitative assessments using the categories susceptible, intermediate, or resistant. In general, current testing methods provide accurate detection of common antimicrobial resistance mechanisms. However, newer or emerging mechanisms of resistance require constant vigilance regarding the ability of each test method to accurately detect resistance.
AB - An important task of the clinical microbiology laboratory is the performance of antimicrobial susceptibility testing of significant bacterial isolates. The goals of testing are to detect possible drug resistance in common pathogens and to assure susceptibility to drugs of choice for particular infections. The most widely used testing methods include broth microdilution or rapid automated instrument methods that use commercially marketed materials and devices. Manual methods that provide flexibility and possible cost savings include the disk diffusion and gradient diffusion methods. Each method has strengths and weaknesses, including organisms that may be accurately tested by the method. Some methods provide quantitative results (eg, minimum inhibitory concentration), and all provide qualitative assessments using the categories susceptible, intermediate, or resistant. In general, current testing methods provide accurate detection of common antimicrobial resistance mechanisms. However, newer or emerging mechanisms of resistance require constant vigilance regarding the ability of each test method to accurately detect resistance.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=72849135301&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=72849135301&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1086/647952
DO - 10.1086/647952
M3 - Review article
C2 - 19857164
AN - SCOPUS:72849135301
SN - 1058-4838
VL - 49
SP - 1749
EP - 1755
JO - Clinical Infectious Diseases
JF - Clinical Infectious Diseases
IS - 11
ER -