TY - JOUR
T1 - Adult Gamma Camera Myocardial Perfusion Imaging
T2 - Diagnostic Reference Levels and Achievable Administered Activities Derived From ACR Accreditation Data
AU - Becker, Murray D.
AU - Butler, Priscilla F.
AU - Bhargavan-Chatfield, Mythreyi
AU - Harkness, Beth A.
AU - Metter, Darlene
AU - MacFarlane, Carolyn Richards
AU - Ghesani, Munir
AU - Wilcox, Pamela
AU - Oates, M. Elizabeth
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 American College of Radiology
PY - 2016/6/1
Y1 - 2016/6/1
N2 - Purpose The aim of this study was to glean from accreditation surveys of US nuclear medicine facilities the in-practice radiopharmaceutical diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) and achievable administered activities (AAAs) for adult gamma camera myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). Methods Data were collected from the ACR Nuclear Medicine Accreditation Program during one three-year accreditation cycle from May 1, 2012, to April 30, 2015. Data elements included radiopharmaceutical, administered activity, examination protocol, interpreting physician specialty, practice type, and facility annual examination volume. Facility demographics, DRLs, and AAAs were tabulated for analysis. Results The calculated DRLs and AAAs are consistent with previously published surveys, and they adhere to national societal guidelines. Facilities seeking ACR accreditation are nearly evenly split between hospital based with multiple gamma cameras and office based with single gamma cameras. The majority of facilities use single-day, low-dosage/high-dosage 99mTc-based protocols; a small minority use 201TlCl protocols. Administered activities show a consistency across facilities, likely reflecting adoption of standard MPI protocols. Conclusions This practice-based analysis provides DRL and AAA benchmarks that nuclear medicine facilities may use to refine gamma camera MPI protocols. In general, the protocols submitted for ACR accreditation are consistent with national societal guidelines. The results suggest that there may be opportunities to further reduce patient radiation exposure by using modified examination protocols and newer gamma camera software and hardware technologies.
AB - Purpose The aim of this study was to glean from accreditation surveys of US nuclear medicine facilities the in-practice radiopharmaceutical diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) and achievable administered activities (AAAs) for adult gamma camera myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). Methods Data were collected from the ACR Nuclear Medicine Accreditation Program during one three-year accreditation cycle from May 1, 2012, to April 30, 2015. Data elements included radiopharmaceutical, administered activity, examination protocol, interpreting physician specialty, practice type, and facility annual examination volume. Facility demographics, DRLs, and AAAs were tabulated for analysis. Results The calculated DRLs and AAAs are consistent with previously published surveys, and they adhere to national societal guidelines. Facilities seeking ACR accreditation are nearly evenly split between hospital based with multiple gamma cameras and office based with single gamma cameras. The majority of facilities use single-day, low-dosage/high-dosage 99mTc-based protocols; a small minority use 201TlCl protocols. Administered activities show a consistency across facilities, likely reflecting adoption of standard MPI protocols. Conclusions This practice-based analysis provides DRL and AAA benchmarks that nuclear medicine facilities may use to refine gamma camera MPI protocols. In general, the protocols submitted for ACR accreditation are consistent with national societal guidelines. The results suggest that there may be opportunities to further reduce patient radiation exposure by using modified examination protocols and newer gamma camera software and hardware technologies.
KW - Myocardial perfusion imaging
KW - diagnostic reference levels
KW - patient radiation exposure
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84964670768&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84964670768&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jacr.2016.02.004
DO - 10.1016/j.jacr.2016.02.004
M3 - Article
C2 - 27131619
AN - SCOPUS:84964670768
SN - 1546-1440
VL - 13
SP - 688
EP - 695
JO - Journal of the American College of Radiology
JF - Journal of the American College of Radiology
IS - 6
ER -