A comparison of the validity of two instruments assessing health professional student perceptions of interprofessional education and practice

Daniel G. Dominguez, David S. Fike, Eric J. Maclaughlin, Joseph A. Zorek

Producción científica: Articlerevisión exhaustiva

70 Citas (Scopus)

Resumen

Health professional education programs increasingly incorporate interprofessional education (IPE) activities into curricula in response to evolving health policy and accreditation requirements in an effort to highlight the benefits of, and prepare students for, interprofessional collaborative practice (IPCP). As such, there is a need for statistically valid instruments designed to assess baseline student perceptions regarding IPE and IPCP. Using confirmatory factor analysis, this study compared the reliability and construct validity of a revised 21-item Attitudes Toward Health Care Teams (ATHCT-R) instrument and a 10-item Student Perceptions of Interprofessional Clinical Education-Revised (SPICE-R) instrument. The instruments were concurrently administered online and completed by a total of 221 first year nursing, optometry, pharmacy, physical therapy, and health administration students. In this study, the SPICE-R exhibited better performance in terms of goodness of fit, construct validity, and reliability compared with the ATHCT-R. The SPICE-R instrument demonstrates promise as a parsimonious, valid, and reliable tool for measuring health professional students' perceptions of IPE and IPCP.

Idioma originalEnglish (US)
Páginas (desde-hasta)144-149
Número de páginas6
PublicaciónJournal of Interprofessional Care
Volumen29
N.º2
DOI
EstadoPublished - mar 1 2015
Publicado de forma externa

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Medicine

Huella

Profundice en los temas de investigación de 'A comparison of the validity of two instruments assessing health professional student perceptions of interprofessional education and practice'. En conjunto forman una huella única.

Citar esto