TY - JOUR
T1 - Повышение качества отчетов о наблюдательных исследованиях в эпидемиологии (STROBE)
T2 - разъяснения и уточнения
AU - the STROBE Initiative
AU - Vandenbroucke, J. P.
AU - von Elm, E.
AU - Altman, D. G.
AU - Gotzsche, P. C.
AU - Mulrow, C. D.
AU - Pocock, S. J.
AU - Poole, C.
AU - Schlesselman, J. J.
AU - Egger, M.
AU - Blettner, Maria
AU - Boffetta, Paolo
AU - Brenner, Hermann
AU - Chene, Genevieve
AU - Cooper, Cyrus
AU - Davey-Smith, George
AU - Gagnon, France
AU - Greenland, Philip
AU - Greenland, Sander
AU - Infante-Rivard, Claire
AU - Loannidis, John
AU - James, Astrid
AU - Jones, Giselle
AU - Ledergerber, Bruno
AU - Little, Julian
AU - May, Margaret
AU - Moher, David
AU - Momen, Hooman
AU - Morabia, Alfredo
AU - Morgenstern, Hal
AU - Paccaud, Fred
AU - Roosli, Martin
AU - Rothenbacher, Dietrich
AU - Rothman, Kenneth
AU - Sabin, Caroline
AU - Sauerbrei, Willi
AU - Say, Lale
AU - Sterne, Jonathan
AU - Syddall, Holly
AU - White, Ian
AU - Wieland, Susan
AU - Williams, Hywel
AU - Zou, Guang Yong
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Publishing House of the Union of Pediatricians. All rights reserved.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Much medical research is observational. The reporting of observational studies is often of insufficient quality. Poor reporting hampers the assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of a study and the generalisability of its results. Taking into account empirical evidence and theoretical considerations, a group of methodologists, researchers, and editors developed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) recommendations to improve the quality of reporting of observational studies. The STROBE Statement consists of a checklist of 22 items, which relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results and discussion sections of articles. Eighteen items are common to cohort studies, case-control studies and cross-sectional studies and four are specific to each of the three study designs. The STROBE Statement provides guidance to authors about how to improve the reporting of observational studies and facilitates critical appraisal and interpretation of studies by reviewers, journal editors and readers. This explanatory and elaboration document is intended to enhance the use, understanding, and dissemination of the STROBE Statement. The meaning and rationale for each checklist item are presented. For each item, one or several published examples and, where possible, references to relevant empirical studies and methodological literature are provided. Examples of useful flow diagrams are also included. The STROBE Statement, this document, and the associated Web site (http://www. strobe-statement.org/) should be helpful resources to improve reporting of observational research. Present article is Russian-language translation of the original manuscript edited by Doctor of Medicine R.T. Saygitov. Present translation was first published in Digital Diagnostics. doi: 10.17816/DD70821. It is published with minor changes related to the literary editing of the translation itself.
AB - Much medical research is observational. The reporting of observational studies is often of insufficient quality. Poor reporting hampers the assessment of the strengths and weaknesses of a study and the generalisability of its results. Taking into account empirical evidence and theoretical considerations, a group of methodologists, researchers, and editors developed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) recommendations to improve the quality of reporting of observational studies. The STROBE Statement consists of a checklist of 22 items, which relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results and discussion sections of articles. Eighteen items are common to cohort studies, case-control studies and cross-sectional studies and four are specific to each of the three study designs. The STROBE Statement provides guidance to authors about how to improve the reporting of observational studies and facilitates critical appraisal and interpretation of studies by reviewers, journal editors and readers. This explanatory and elaboration document is intended to enhance the use, understanding, and dissemination of the STROBE Statement. The meaning and rationale for each checklist item are presented. For each item, one or several published examples and, where possible, references to relevant empirical studies and methodological literature are provided. Examples of useful flow diagrams are also included. The STROBE Statement, this document, and the associated Web site (http://www. strobe-statement.org/) should be helpful resources to improve reporting of observational research. Present article is Russian-language translation of the original manuscript edited by Doctor of Medicine R.T. Saygitov. Present translation was first published in Digital Diagnostics. doi: 10.17816/DD70821. It is published with minor changes related to the literary editing of the translation itself.
KW - STROBE
KW - case-control studies
KW - cohort studies
KW - cross-sectional studies
KW - observational studies
KW - study design
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85135787270&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85135787270&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.15690/vsp.v21i3.2426
DO - 10.15690/vsp.v21i3.2426
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85135787270
SN - 1682-5527
VL - 21
SP - 173
EP - 208
JO - Voprosy Sovremennoi Pediatrii - Current Pediatrics
JF - Voprosy Sovremennoi Pediatrii - Current Pediatrics
IS - 3
ER -