What we know about predoctoral internship training: A 10-year update

James M. Stedman

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

19 Scopus citations


Ten years ago (Stedman, 1997), I published a review of the extensive body of work related to all facets of the internship enterprise. The current review highlights many positive accomplishments of the last 10 years, including establishing the match, the uniform internship application format, the quantification of selection variables, and a deeper understanding of the training pathway. However, serious problems have surfaced, including the shortfall of internship slots and the impact of economic forces leading some to question the continuing relevance of internship as it currently exists. These issues call for deliberation and decision making by the profession, guided by research, both current and yet to be conducted. PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2007 APA, all rights reserved.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)74-88
Number of pages15
JournalTraining and Education in Professional Psychology
Issue number1
StatePublished - Feb 1 2007


  • Clinical education in psychology
  • Clinical psychology internship
  • Predoctoral internship training

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Psychology(all)


Dive into the research topics of 'What we know about predoctoral internship training: A 10-year update'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this